Telemetry, I thought you might enjoy this discussion with someone who actually understand highly advanced chemistry and not four or five classes (Organic Chemistry probably was the height unless we see a transcript proving higher, that's where I tapped out). Continue reading the argument between someone who clearly does not understand the roles of the Organic Chemistry doctor he's arguing with.
"
> > > I don't doubt that some synthetic organic chemists or chemical
> > > engineers may lean towards creationism, but thankfully they are not
> > > involved in the biology aspects of drug discovery or development.
> > >
> > > steven pirie-shepherd PhD
> >
> > What a self-servicing onanistic load of road apples! It is the organic
> > chemists who need to know the _exact_ composition and concentration in
> > a process. It is the organic chemists who break transformations down
> > into discrete reaction steps and molecular geometries. They do not
> > invoke magic "enzymes" to make B from A. They don't cook up
> > "antibodies" of unknown composition which act as little gods of the
> > dish - adamase and evease.
>
> Hmmm, there is nothing "magic" about enzymes. The reaction mechanisms
> of enzymes are well studied and known for a great number of enzymes.
> Crystallographers have managed to obtain "snapshots" of many of the
> steps in various biochemical reactions at a high degree of resolution.
>
Alas, reactions rarely take place in the crystal and thus such
snapshots are of questionable use.
> Antibodies are well known entities, I don't think they merit the use
> of " ". I certainly don't worship antibodies, although I use them
> frequently as well-defined tools with defined interactions. The site..."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.chem/7OnH02OW8PY