we all know that beth hell monitors this site.. they have repeatedly had sites shut down for quoting large portions of their litterature.
not this one.. do you think this board enables them to keep a finger on the pulse of what is going on in ex and aposto land?
hb.
multiple attempts were made to log into my account
If you have the interest and resources to pursue this, it is a felony in most states to log into someone's e-mail account without permission, and an attempted felony to attempt to do so. People have been prosecuted for this kind of thing.
http://www.volokh.com/2010/12/27/man-prosecuted-for-reading-wifes-e-mail-without-her-authorization/
http://communications-media.lawyers.com/privacy-law/Email-Hacking-Is-A-Serious-Crime.html
we all know that beth hell monitors this site.. they have repeatedly had sites shut down for quoting large portions of their litterature.
not this one.. do you think this board enables them to keep a finger on the pulse of what is going on in ex and aposto land?
hb.
"fair use laws" which are protected by our 2nd amendment.
Well, technically "fair use" may not be protected by the U.S. Constitution, and certainly not by the Second Amendment, which pertains to bearing arms. But that aside, I think what the OP meant is that forums can be asked to remove voluminous copy-and-paste jobs that violate copyright laws and be shut down if they don't comply, whether the creator of the forum is the one who posted the material or not. I don't know how often Simon has dealt with this if at all, but I think the OP is implying that if they wanted to, there are a number of long WTS literature posts that they could have had removed from this site if they really wanted to police it heavily using the weight of the DMCA.
we all know that beth hell monitors this site.. they have repeatedly had sites shut down for quoting large portions of their litterature.
not this one.. do you think this board enables them to keep a finger on the pulse of what is going on in ex and aposto land?
hb.
Interesting stuff, Balaamsass. I wonder if they keep files associating people's real names with their websites/usernames in the case of those DF'd/DA'd who don't try to hide their identities. It wouldn't surprise me. Dubs love to keep files on everything.
.
.
background check first.. .
How desperate their parents acted by calling the circuit overseer and bethel elders in NY
You're not trying hard enough to sound authentic anymore, Aunt Connie. I score your most recent post a 4/10. The original one was a 6.5/10. If any parent has ever called Bethel because their child was not invited to a party, I'm the Queen of England. You need to step up your game.
anyone give this a try?
i was looking at the site for the new light (about gb=fds) when i noticed the 'login' option.
also didn't see any 'search' option available.
Well then I stand corrected. I hadn't tried to open one. I doubt you are going to have access to additional features though. But keep up posted.
without fanfare, jehovahs witnesses quietly soften position on blood transfusionstom blackwell, national post staff | dec 20, 2012 9:59 pm et.
more from national post staff.
calgary herald/fileslawrence hughes broke with the witnesses, and the rest of his own family, when it tried to prevent his teenage daughter, bethany, who died in 2002, from receiving a blood transfusion while being treated for cancer.twittergoogle+linkedinemailcommentsmoretumblrpinterestredditdiggfarkitstumbleuponfor years, the jehovahs witnesses fiercely held belief that blood transfusions are contrary to gods will led to emotional and very public disputes, hospitals clashing with parents over whether to infuse sick children.. that long history of messy legal confrontations appears to be vanishing, however, amid changing approaches to the issue on both sides, health-care officials say.. the churchs ban on accepting blood still stands, but some major pediatric hospitals have begun officially acknowledging the parents unorthodox beliefs, while many jehovahs witnesses are signing letters recognizing that doctors may sometimes feel obliged to transfuse, they say.. as institutions show more respect toward parents faith and try harder not to use blood, witnesses often seem eager to avoid involving child-welfare authorities to facilitate transfusions, and more accepting that canadian case law is firmly on the doctors side, some hospital officials say.. they get it that were going to transfuse where its medically necessary.
why bother litigating a case in which in the end it appears the Witnesses will most likely lose?
This was not the Watchtower position in the past, so it is a change. They are not litigating because it's an embarrassment to the Watchtower and the parents that they would let their children die over this nonsense. When I was young, they printed articles in the literature likening a blood transfusion to rape and implying that it would be proper for a child who had a blood transfusion forced on her to scream and protest and pull the tubes out of her arms.
anyone give this a try?
i was looking at the site for the new light (about gb=fds) when i noticed the 'login' option.
also didn't see any 'search' option available.
I don't think you can just create an account. They allow various accounts for different brothers with responsibilities now, like accounting duties, turning in field service records and all. They also have a feature where authorized users can view the names of the COBE and secretary for any congregation.
pages 433-437 inter alia, of the book "myers on evidence in child, domestic or elder abuse cases" fourth edition refers.. you can view this very informative material at google books.
this shows how the watchtower's strict interpretation of the biblical two-witness rule is very much out of harmony with the modern legal system in matters of child sex abuse.
j.r. brown, watchtower spokesman, is reported by the associated press on february 11, 2001 to have said:"...corroborating evidence can be used instead of a second witness to prove wrongdoing.
children within the community are more unlikely to be exposed to anything sexual as a general rule than maybe other children
I remember there being a lot of talks in the KH about masturbation, homosexuality, porneia, harlots, concubines, fornication and adultery. Maybe this is true overall, however. It's an interesting point, you make, ItsMyLife.
Not all false accusations are made by toddlers, though. Sometimes accusations made years later by teens or adults are fabricated for various reasons, such as financial gain. I imagine they are tough cases to deal with since physical evidence or witnesses are unlikely to exist, but it's understandable why victims might surpress what happened for so long.
we all know that beth hell monitors this site.. they have repeatedly had sites shut down for quoting large portions of their litterature.
not this one.. do you think this board enables them to keep a finger on the pulse of what is going on in ex and aposto land?
hb.
There are apologists who sincerely (I think) try to refute everything, from the UN issue to the false prophesies to the misquotes to the pseudo-science, to the child abuse policies and everything else. I don't doubt that some at Bethel could read everything here and still think they're right. I'm sure if they do assign anyone to the task, they choose them very carefully. Probably not only the most highly indocrinated, but those who would have the most to lose by leaving.
pages 433-437 inter alia, of the book "myers on evidence in child, domestic or elder abuse cases" fourth edition refers.. you can view this very informative material at google books.
this shows how the watchtower's strict interpretation of the biblical two-witness rule is very much out of harmony with the modern legal system in matters of child sex abuse.
j.r. brown, watchtower spokesman, is reported by the associated press on february 11, 2001 to have said:"...corroborating evidence can be used instead of a second witness to prove wrongdoing.
Courts don't require two witnesses, but you are more likely to get a conviction with multiple witnesses, or one witness and some physical evidence. Studies have shown that false accusations of child molestation represent about 10% of all accusations. So I would rather require more evidence than just the accuser's word than take a 10% chance that an innocent person's life is being destroyed. There have been a number of cases where the parent is paranoid that their child has been abused and they basically coach the child as to what to say, believing they are doing the right thing. With that said, requiring that the extra evidence be two witnesses is plain stupid.
