Chaserious
JoinedPosts by Chaserious
-
38
Who Benefits from the Multi-Billion Dollar Real Estate Empire that is WT?
by TTATTelder inthis thread is to formally address this subject.
this is for forum members and especially for lurkers (current witnesses reading this in secret).
please feel free to post any additional points.. there are a lot of changes happening in wt land.
-
Chaserious
In before Illuminati, Rothschilds, RandCam, Freemasons, and whoever shot JFK. -
35
Looks like ABC New York got the okay.
by truthseekeriam inhttp://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=1&doc_id=2025979&doc_no=a136641.
12/19/2014order filed.
upon due consideration, the media request of applicant abc news to make a video recording of oral argument in the above-referenced appeal is granted.
-
Chaserious
It is kind of at the eleventh hour, but I would think that if someone who can make a bona fide claim to being a member of the media (such as running or contributing to a blog, website, etc) wished to attend, they too could get permission to record.
I was a court employee for a year and we were very careful about giving equal access rights to all members of the media, whether they be a lone blogger or a major newspaper reporter.
-
41
Upcoming meeting Re: KH Construction
by pixel infresh from the "press":to all bodies of elders in the united states branch territoryre: local design/construction department broadcastdear brothers:the work of constructing and maintaining theocratic facilities throughout the unitedstates branch territory is indeed great!
(1 chron.
29:1) with this in mind, we are pleased to informyou of a special meeting to be presented on saturday, january 31, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. easternstandard time (est) to all elders and circuit overseers in the united states branch territory.the meeting will be approximately two and a half hours in length and will includepresentations by members of the local design/construction department, the united statesbranch committee, the worldwide design/construction department, and a member of the governingbody.
-
Chaserious
Will the new design feature a large, blinking jw.org sign on the roofs? -
9
"You insulted our Prophet" similarities with WTS / Paris attacks
by AFRIKANMAN in"this is from the nov. 15th 1952 question from readers.
this is directly from the cd btw:
questions from readers in the case of where a father or mother or son or daughter is disfellowshipped ,how should such person be treated by members of the family in their family relationship?p.c.,ontario, canada.
-
Chaserious
Kind of a weak comparion.. it says there that God's law through Christ forbids us from killing them.
It is kind of disgusting the contempt with which they describe how disfellowshipped people deserve to die, though. The connection to radical Islam is not there however.
-
43
Je Suis Charlie
by Slidin Fast inthis incident in paris makes me feel absolutely furious.
yes i feel desperately sorry for the victims and their families no one should have to deal with that.
the thing that makes me feel absolutely incandescent though is the attack on freedom of speech and expression.
-
Chaserious
I think countries have the power to shut down religions that pose a threat to the protection of its inherent citizens who are incompliance to those laws of the land.
If a government were to ban Islam, do you really think these extremist animals would just pack up and work 9-5 in a cubicle somewhere? If anything, it would probably fan the flames of their persecution complex and need for vengeance. A lot of them are trained and belong to terror cells in Muslim countries anyway. I would suspect if they are not raised this way, more are radicalized on the internet than in a mosque.
There isn't an easy answer to terrorism, and realistically such a barbaric attack probably does chill free speech to some extent, as some have observed. Hopefully the resolve of the French people and free societies everywhere won't allow that to happen. But I can't imagine that outlawing a religion, the majority of whose adherents are not terrorists, would have any deterrent effect.
-
29
Conti Appeal Oral Arguments slated for 9 A.M., Jan. 14, 2014. Recap of Defendant Watchtower's Complaint of Errors for your info.
by AndersonsInfo inconti appeal hearing-summary of watchtowers complaint of errors with plaintiff's reply.
the following statements were taken from the introduction of respondents brief a136641 -attorney richard simons' response for plaintiff.
defendants argue that the affirmative duty imposed by the trial court impinges on their religious freedom.
-
Chaserious
Yes, let's hope for a good outcome for Ms. Conti after all of this. -
29
Conti Appeal Oral Arguments slated for 9 A.M., Jan. 14, 2014. Recap of Defendant Watchtower's Complaint of Errors for your info.
by AndersonsInfo inconti appeal hearing-summary of watchtowers complaint of errors with plaintiff's reply.
the following statements were taken from the introduction of respondents brief a136641 -attorney richard simons' response for plaintiff.
defendants argue that the affirmative duty imposed by the trial court impinges on their religious freedom.
-
Chaserious
If the WT lose this appeal do they have an automatic right to appeal to the California Supreme Court or could they be refused further right of appeal?
The California Supreme Court would have the discretion to accept the appeal or not. They can refuse to hear it without explaining why. If there is a further petition for review, it should be granted or denied within 4-6 months from when the Court of Appeal opinion is released.
Of course, if the CA Supreme Court accepts the appeal, that would trigger a whole new round of briefing, oral argument, etc.
-
29
Conti Appeal Oral Arguments slated for 9 A.M., Jan. 14, 2014. Recap of Defendant Watchtower's Complaint of Errors for your info.
by AndersonsInfo inconti appeal hearing-summary of watchtowers complaint of errors with plaintiff's reply.
the following statements were taken from the introduction of respondents brief a136641 -attorney richard simons' response for plaintiff.
defendants argue that the affirmative duty imposed by the trial court impinges on their religious freedom.
-
Chaserious
So confused as to how long this could go on?? Does anyone know if this is the end of the line after this decision?
The panel will issue a written opinion within 90 days after the oral argument date. It could be sooner; 30-60 day turnaround is common.
Then the decision can be appealed to the California Supreme Court. That must be filed within 10 days after the court of appeals opinion is filed.
-
27
Experience in a talk
by Da.Furious inlast week we had an elder giving a talk, cant remember the title.. the thing that was of interest is the experience he gave:.
"a brother who was working in a hospital had to leave his job which was paying him good money because the nurses wanted to sleep with him and they kept putting notes for him on his desk!".
this is not the first time i hear similar experience.
-
Chaserious
Is he a doctor? Because if I have learned anything from all the hospital shows on TV it is that the nurses always want to sleep with the doctors. -
13
Is the Watchtower Shifting All Financial and Legal Risk to Local Elders, are they 100% liable for Negligence?
by Trailer Park Pioneer inwhat is the watchtower organization leaving behind for all the kingdom halls after their done siphoning them dry?
who is going to pay for a lawsuit or damages when some incompetent elders or three are busted for something very bad?
will the watchtower help or leave them alone for the sharks to shred to pieces?
-
Chaserious
the BoE would be any new plaintiff's first target.
Individuals are never a plaintiff's first target unless they are covered by insurance or top 1%-ish wealthy.
Whether there is organizatonal liability depends on what is involved in the lawsuit. I cant think of what kind of lawsuits would expose elders to liability on a frequent basis. I dont recall ever hearing of an elder exposed to personal liability for a congregation matter; not that it couldn't have happened.
I'm sure the organization is trying/has tried to insulate themselves from garden variety lawsuits like car accidents involving publishers. It's possible the cong could be sued for that kind of thing; although don't the congregations participate in some kind of general insurance fund through the WTS? Not that they would sue for coverage of course, if the WTS didn't cover an incident.