may you all have unabashed neopolitan amounts of peace with cherries on top
lol thank you everyone for your discussion and thoughts! I guess I sure picked an interesting subject :-P
and while I don't really have the mental energy to address everyone's comments individually, I do have a major issue with one thing that was said in particular by AGuest (and no offense is meant by this).
AGuest said: "Ummm... first, it's not His book, dear one, truly. If it were HIS book... it wouldn't be used to justify all of the heinous things done because of it. Or cause the "dividing of the Christ" that it has. That one book has cause FAR more crimes against humanity... and much more division among mankind... particularly among those who call themselves "christians"... than virtually any other book ever written, compiled, and/or published."
You CANNOT say the Bible is NOT "God's" book and then use it to argue FOR God. It is a complete contradiction and weakens the foundation for anything you say. The Bible IS the Christian source. And I guarantee you that the Bible would not apply Ecclesiastes 12:12 (to the making of many books there is no end...) to ITSELF. It would be discrediting itself, yet it claims to be an accurate book FROM God. No book that was claiming to be a credible book would group ITSELF with books that it claims are a waste of time.
Just so you know, your "explanation" of the whole....adam/flesh/spirit/nakedness thing....kinda hokey. You might as well be trying to tell us the trinity doctrine is real.
And also...I'm guessing that your source for the "name of Death" is the "Lord"? Again, no offense, but using your own personal "revelations" as your main source of dispensing what you perceive to be truth is not going to convince anyone that what you say IS truth. Unfortunately, it is that precise claim and reasoning that leads to the creation of dangerous cults. I just broke away from one of them. I don't need to get sucked into another. So while I DO appreciate you sharing your thoughts....perhaps you should present them more as your opinion and not as "truth", as there is no way possible to PROVE your statements. It is the same as the JW's or any other religion who uses the Bible to prove the Bible is accurate. You need more than the source in question to prove the credibility of the source.
ziddina - I actually have briefly pondered the concept of the christian god not being the REAL god...mentally lighting upon tidbits of Egyptian history, though I certainly have done very little, if any, real research. I will have to check out the links you provided when I'm more awake, though ;-)
i hope everyone has fluffy angel dreams with cheery pan flute music on repeat in their brains....