Yeru suggests that "died at Megiddo" might mean "suffered mortal wound at Megiddo, but died somewhere else." Well, according to the Chronicles author, Josiah died at Jerusalem. Thus, Yeru is suggesting that the Kings author may have known that Josiah was only wounded at Megiddo, but actually died at Jerusalem. This doesn't make sense. What value could come from the Kings author leaving the impression that Josiah died at Megiddo? Isn't the most probable reason for the "apparent" discrepancy that the two authors had different understandings about the place of Josiah's death? Answering for myself, I say, Of course.
The other possibility suggested by Yeru is unlikely. If either of the Kings or Chronicles authors knew that they didn't know exactly where Josiah died, they should have said so. The fact that they didn't do that shows that perhaps other authors in other places in the Bible wrote things they weren't sure were true, but didn't tell us so. This explanation would be totally unacceptable to those who believe that the Bible is the word of a god who knows all there is to know. It's even unacceptable to those who believe that the Bible is the word of mere men, and that they made mistakes; in such a case, however, one may still fault the writers for not letting us know that they didn't know for sure where Josiah died. Alternatively, if they innocently were in possession of wrong information, then we are still faced with the problem of not knowing which others stories in the Bible are similarly flawed. Either way, the Bible is in error.
Now, Moxy has a healthy attitude toward the Bible, it seems: Not every--if any--word in the Bible was dictated by God, and that the 2 Timothy author was exaggerating when he said that "all scripture is God-breathed." One, or the other, of the Kings and Chronicles authors were wrong, perhaps both were, but this discrepancy is of zero importance in the larger scheme of things, which is the spiritual message of the Bible. Thus, Moxy implies, the Bible is in error in regards to the place of Josiah's death, but nobody should care.
I agree that people shouldn't care, but, unfortunately, there are those who regard questions of Bible error to be of life-or-death importance. If they are unable to believe that every word of the Bible is the perfect message of God, then they won't be able to believe with certainty that the Biblical instructions for eternal salvation are correct. Thus, if one cannot believe that, say, the Kings author really meant that Josiah received his wounds at Megiddo, but actually died at Jerusalem, their salvation is in jeopardy.
Joseph F. Alward
"Skeptical Views of Christianity and the Bible"
http://members.aol.com/jalw/joseph_alward.html