"How would your religion deal with a member who no longer believes in the events alleged by your organization to have happened in 1914?"
Find out why. And review the facts with such a one. Now if then this person becomes a divisive element in the congregation by promoting his views he can be disfellowshipped. --- Titus 3:10,11; 1 Timothy 1:19,20
I would like Mr Penny to explain how action such as this towards a member, who's only crime is to express individual thinking, does NOT imply strong cultish undertones.
Also, why is there such a fear of the rank and file being swayed by alternative thinking among the ranks if their belief is supposedly so strong? Surely the thoughts of an individual would not be a serious threat unless there was some danger of them having doubts themselves?