Jehovah's Witnesses Who Refuse to Decline Blood Transfusions
I found the comments on the differences between "refusal" and "decline" to be very interesting.
It is well known among current and former Jehovah's Witnesses than any active Jehovah's Witness who refuses to decline a blood transfusion can be subject to disfellowshipping which includes shunning from their Jehovah's Witness friends and relatives.
While Mr. Wade complains about the "paternalism" of physicians who might question the beliefs of Jehovah's Witness patients as "coercive questioning", I am curious why he does not mention the coercive threat of disfellowshipping that has been made by the leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses to any member that accepts any part of the blood that the Watchtower has deemed unacceptable. If one doubts this here is the quote:
"The inspired Holy Scriptures answer yes....According to the law of Moses, which set forth shadows of things to come, the receiver of a blood transfusion must be cut off from God's people by excommunication or disfellowshiping....if in the future he persists in accepting blood transfusions or in donating blood toward the carrying out of this medical practice upon others, he shows that he has really not repented, but is deliberately opposed to God's requirements. As a rebellious opposer and unfaithful example to fellow members of the Christian congregation he must be cut off therefrom by disfellowshiping."- The Watchtower 01/15/1961 pp. 63, 64
Has this view changed? How does Mr. Wade respond to this?
Jeffery M. Schwehm
Assistant Professor of Chemistry
Concordia University, Nebraska