Posts by alice.in.wonderland

103

Damage Control on Secret Societies

by alice.in.wonderland in

damage control on secret societies .

http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm .

satanic activities of secret societies.

Damage Control on Secret Societies

by alice.in.wonderland in

damage control on secret societies .

http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm .

satanic activities of secret societies.

alice.in.wonderland

"You didn't answer the question.....

What is the WTS's Truth..... it's 'good news or gospel' if you will

What do we mean when we say 'its the TRUTH'?"

The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society is Bible truth and pure teachings, the truth about God, the origin of reality: the natural world and the physical universe. As far as accurate knowledge of truth is concerned are you wanting me to put different scriptures together: speak a pure language and demonstrate accurate knowledge of truth?

For then I shall give to peoples the change to a pure language, in order for them all to call upon the name of Jehovah, in order to serve him shoulder to shoulder.’ Zephaniah 3:9

103

Damage Control on Secret Societies

by alice.in.wonderland in

damage control on secret societies .

http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm .

satanic activities of secret societies.

alice.in.wonderland

"I am an active JW....... Jehovah-Father, Jesus-Son, Holy Spirit- Jah's active force.

So I am sure you discern the importance of displaying accurate knowledge in your answer to my question."

If you're active as one of Jehovah's Witnesses fine. I'm a baptized publisher and I attend the South Main Congregation. What Hall do you go to and what is your name? [email protected] I can provide that information to you. Nothing is more offensive than someone masquerading as one Jehovah's Witnesses.

69

The God Delusion

by alice.in.wonderland in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/the_god_delusion.

the god delusion is a 2006 bestselling non-fiction book by british biologist richard dawkins, professorial fellow of new college, oxford, and inaugural holder of the charles simonyi chair for the public understanding of science at the university of oxford.. .

in the god delusion, dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that belief in a personal god qualifies as a delusion, which he defines as a persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence.

alice.in.wonderland

"Mrs. J, I think #7, too.

This is what??? 3rd or 4th controvertial topic started, posted on a couple times and then abandoned when she can't stand the heat?"

I haven't abandoned anything. If I haven't replied it is because I'm doing something else.

69

The God Delusion

by alice.in.wonderland in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/the_god_delusion.

the god delusion is a 2006 bestselling non-fiction book by british biologist richard dawkins, professorial fellow of new college, oxford, and inaugural holder of the charles simonyi chair for the public understanding of science at the university of oxford.. .

in the god delusion, dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that belief in a personal god qualifies as a delusion, which he defines as a persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence.

alice.in.wonderland

"Jehovah's Witnesses aren't mention in his book"

" yes, they are mentioned in his book,

might be good to read the book yourself."

I've read different parts dealing with Pascal's Wager and homosexuality.

103

Damage Control on Secret Societies

by alice.in.wonderland in

damage control on secret societies .

http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm .

satanic activities of secret societies.

alice.in.wonderland

" You will need a much better Education,to debate most of the people here.."

Eduction? Feel free to join me on msdn.microsoft.com as I do contribute something to society in the way of literary output plus 10 years experience in complex software solutions design, development, and delivery. What do you do?

Leolaia posts intelligent comments and there are others...(not naming any names) and then are those that must be on hydroponic weed, mushrooms or didn't graduate from the third grade.

103

Damage Control on Secret Societies

by alice.in.wonderland in

damage control on secret societies .

http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm .

satanic activities of secret societies.

alice.in.wonderland

palmtree67, I didn't insult you. Most people I've seen as implicated as “not caring about God” simply say that God doesn't exist as Bigfoot doesn't exist. That's what I'm used to hearing. I'm used to participating on this forum where I'm treated much more respectfully:

http://www.chron.com/channel/houstonbelief/commons/persona.html?newspaperUserId=alice.in.wonderland

This forum is much, much different. How do you change these inane avatars?

103

Damage Control on Secret Societies

by alice.in.wonderland in

damage control on secret societies .

http://www.watchtower.org/e/19970601/article_01.htm .

satanic activities of secret societies.

alice.in.wonderland

" Like palmtree said, prove it. Doesn't all of this boil down to this belief? Where's the proof to back up this assertion? Which leads me to a comment I made in reference to "God's true ogranization" on another of your threads: The belief that God must have one true organization on Earth is only an assumption. Taking other people's assumptions as facts makes you a fool and sets you up to be manipulated. Taking your own assumptions as facts makes you willfully ignorant. What do you say for yourself on my questions and statements?"

If someone is a sincere truth seeker and they come in contact with the truth, once they're advanced to a certain point, they try and give testimony to others. At that point it's only an assumption. It only makes sense for those that discovered universal truth to share this with others and unite in an organized manner.

This is the general stance of most atheists because of their religious exposure to Christendom's churches:

http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-390-Religion.aspx

Most major religions have believed in the existence of a supernatural realm, a realm beyond the natural world of physical objects and bodies governed by causal laws, the world we perceive with our senses and can study by rational methods. Some religions posit a personal god (or gods); others believe in impersonal supernatural forces. (See George Walsh, The Role of Religion in History, chapter 1.) Objectivism rejects any notion of the supernatural as incompatible with the objectivity and regularity of nature as identified by reason. There is no credible evidence of miracles, magic, or other supernatural phenomena in nature.

The dominant forms of religion in our culture posit a personal god, a Supreme Being, who created the world, is omnipotent and omniscient, imposes moral duties on man, and expects worship. Those who accept this idea have the burden of showing why such a hypothesis is necessary. In this regard, Objectivists are atheists because the arguments for the existence of such a being are not sound. Objectivists reject the existence of God for the same reason they reject the existence of elves, leprechauns, and unicorns: because there is no credible evidence of such beings.

The biggest obstacle to most of the proof/ evidence (science based) atheists or agnostics is they haven't observed or experienced any intervention from God in society or in their personal life so they're left with a lot of unanswered questions. This is not the case in Jehovah's Organization.

The truth of the matter, is God has a powerful method of revealing his existence to faithful men of old as well as his modern day human subjects:

On the other hand, the fruitage of the spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, mildness, self-control. Against such things there is no law. Galatians 5:22-23

Faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the evident demonstration of realities though not beheld. For by means of this the men of old times had witness borne to them. Hebrews 11:1-2

Whether someone chooses to investigate this themselves is entirely up to them.