A book can no more control a person as any other inanaimate object.
Psac, didn't we go through this in another thread? I don't mean that disrespectfully, just that I seem to remember a similar discussion.
I'm sorry, I thought this part was understood. -> Holy books instruct the reader to do this and not do that, right?
In that respect, people who take a literal view of the Koran obey it's rules. It controls them. Same goes for the Bible. For example, some folks don't question Yahweh's actions in the OT because the Bible tells them that pride comes before a fall. Ergo, it affects, influences, controls their thinking to some extent.
You are assuming I didn't and you are incorrect in that regard.
You said this in reference to my comment that you called God out on his child slayings before you questioned the authenticity, accuracy, and divinity of the bible.
If you did conduct an unbiased investigation of the facts before accepting the bible and only later demanded God answer for his atrocious acts, well I apologize for making that assumption. I was wrong.
However, I would like to state that simply having books on atheism doesn't preclude a person from holding onto bias when reading them. I'm not saying you did or didn't. Just clarifying, since I know many Christians who have books on atheism and many atheists who have books on religion.