Hi everyone.
While I can see you have all been tempted to pidgeonhole "prophet" as someone that says inspired prophetic words from God concerning events to happen but this is going against the bible's greater usage of the word "prophet"
By trying to pigeonhole a 'prophet" into the role of a predictor. This allows you to point at Witnesses attempts at Chronology, and point out where mistakes have been made.
This is convienent because this allows the people who are against witnesses to immediatly reject all things from the WTS based on a label they have invented for witnesses.
However, they never claimed to be predictors. Duet 18 makes it clear it has to be an inspired prediction directly spoke to them by God from his words..
Another function of a prophet is to warn others.
Ezekiel and Jeremiah warned of impending judgement. JW do this as well, by acting as "watchman" in the same way Ezekiel was given this role.
JW warn of impending Armegeddon (which is after all a biblical teaching)and give out the message to become reconciled to Jehovah. In that way they act as prophets.
There was the time when Jesus breathed holy spirit onto the Apostles. That made them error free right? they werer also prophets yet...
No, but wait! They then went on to promulgate a false teaching. They came to believe that Jesus had prophesied the future of Apostle John and they he would never die.
So they must have been false prophets, telling people that in the future John would never die when we all know that John *did* die.
Did the holy spirit make a mistake when they promulgated that false teaching? They were prophets and unlike witnesses could also predict the future but did both these make them false prophets when they promulgated a mistaken understanding from Jesus's word about john? no.
I have enjoyed this discussion too because people can see the clear steps when you all had to accept the bible in Deut 18 makes it clear witnesses do not claim to prophetic inspired words from Jehovah. You then have to retrench to another position aka they call themselves "prophets" so any mistakes they make are false teachings aka false prophecy according to you when this is against Deut 18 and pidgeonholes a prophet to being a predictor only.
Some then try and condemn using the watchtowers (no longer able to use the bible) proof texting articles which themselves explain they in no way claim to make inspired predictions and only say understandings they have drawn from Bible prophecies and chronology.
I am not the one retrenching and repositioning the goal posts on this topic my position is the same now as it was at the beginning. According to Deut 18 God's own word they are not false prophets.