Hi Brotherdan
The shepherds have the automony to make decisions for the whole that is biblical
Hebrews 13:17
Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.
and those decisions don't have to be inspired they simply have to be Bible directed because the Bible is inspired.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 (New International Version)
16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
You are confusing having authority with being inspired they are not the sme thing.
The creteria for inspiration had to be put down so people knew which books of the bible where inspired from among other writings etc used in that time.
If someone says "God told me that Armageddon happens on August the 15th at 2pm" that would be claiming inspiration.
If someone told me "Based on the inspired prophecy in the Bible and the chronology from the Bible I see it pointing to august as the time of the end" that would not be claiming to do prophecy.
The difference is simple one person claims to have conversations with God the other does not they use his bible. I find it hard the people on here cannot see the simple truth of this?
Witnesses have never claimed to have direct conversations with God any promises, or prophecies, or Chronology they refer to is from the bible only and can be openly seen to be from the bible. "this generation won't pass away"? Jesus's words from the Bible. God's promise of a peaceful earth? from the bible psalms and isaiah. "Times time and half"? from the bible revelation and daniel. "a year for a day"? from the Bible. Armageddon? from the Bible. And the list goes on.
The Bible give many examples of people called prophets that did not prophecy. There is no mention of them prophecying or saying words from God. No circumstances even pointing to it and in Miriam case she made mistakes and got leprosy. So your opinion is Just that saying "that lack of Biblical backing doesn't matter" your opinion is more important.
If people prefer to believe your opinion that Prophets have to prophecy without Bible backing for your opinion because the Bible clearly shows examples of prophets that have no inspired prophecies to their name which backs my point, that is their choice.
This doesn't take away from the fact that the Bible makes clear statements on what makes someone a false prophet and it isn't calling themself prophets, it is claiming to be able to say the very words directly from Jehovah himself and witnesses have never done this. If you want to make your own "goal posts" or creteria for what constitutes a false prophet and stick it on witnesses then you are only fooling yourself.