Gerard

Joined

• started 214 topics
• posted 2,673 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Gerard

• 
  40

  GENETICS- CREATIONISTS need not be INTIMIDATED.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  genetics- creationists need not be intimidated.. .

  internet evolutionists almost universally and repetitiously proclaim that modern neo-darwinian evolutionary theory is supported by overwhelming evidence and that there is no evidence for biblical creation (or even mere intelligent design) for that matter.

  they will dogmatically claim that evolution receives universal support from all the real scientists and all the facts from genetics, biology, geology, paleontology, and every other ology that one can think of.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  I didn't read our "warning"? Sure, now I have to spend $30 in junk fiction in order to call you on this bullshit? I don't need to read creationist crap to realize it is crap from the onset. I have a few degrees myself in molecular biology and waving his titles does not impress me. He could not publish properly his dishonest hypothesis as a scientist, so he wrote a fiction story. What a big man! In addition, he declared in a Kansas court that regardless of the evidence, he believes that the Earth is only 5000 years old. That is the quality of his intelectual honesty. Faith is not science. Faith is not truth. Faith is hope for what is not. Science can say "we don't know"; creationists want to believe Superman did it. Want the truth or want it easy? Oh wait, easy does it, right?

  Take your wand. Swirl and flick. Nice job!
• 
  45

  Borg cubes will reach us in approximately 20 hours

  by sd-7 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  borg message incoming.

  on screen.. borg: blizzard is irrelevant.

  even though this is a judicial matter, it's really a shepherding call.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  Thinking of you buddy. Stay strong.
• 
  20

  Evolution and Dragons??

  by TastingFreedom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ger6en8c7q&nr=1.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13e0mmmc_-0&nr=1.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylt0mj0py58&feature=related.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  No. Some cultures asumed there were "dragons" after finding dinosaur fosils. That is all.
• 
  40

  GENETICS- CREATIONISTS need not be INTIMIDATED.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  genetics- creationists need not be intimidated.. .

  internet evolutionists almost universally and repetitiously proclaim that modern neo-darwinian evolutionary theory is supported by overwhelming evidence and that there is no evidence for biblical creation (or even mere intelligent design) for that matter.

  they will dogmatically claim that evolution receives universal support from all the real scientists and all the facts from genetics, biology, geology, paleontology, and every other ology that one can think of.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  Burn the Ships, you have a good understanding of genetics and the facility to express it in layman's terms. Nice job. I wish i had your patience.
• 
  40

  GENETICS- CREATIONISTS need not be INTIMIDATED.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  genetics- creationists need not be intimidated.. .

  internet evolutionists almost universally and repetitiously proclaim that modern neo-darwinian evolutionary theory is supported by overwhelming evidence and that there is no evidence for biblical creation (or even mere intelligent design) for that matter.

  they will dogmatically claim that evolution receives universal support from all the real scientists and all the facts from genetics, biology, geology, paleontology, and every other ology that one can think of.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  All DNA served or serves a purpose, if even of DNA variety storage. I may code for proteins while in a specific stage of development such as the fertilized egg, fetus, child adolescent, adult and elder. Genes are turned on and off under a marvelous feedback system with sensors to the cell AND the environment. It is only a matter of seeing what DNA is being transcribed under what age or circumstances. Some DNA is turned on oonly during birth, only while exposed to cold, only while exposed to altitude, only when dieing...etc. In fact, it has been shown that large portions of seemingly "unused" or junk and folded DNA (hypercoiled DNA with its regular scafolding proteins) sometimes code for normal proteins while folded.
• 
  40

  GENETICS- CREATIONISTS need not be INTIMIDATED.

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  genetics- creationists need not be intimidated.. .

  internet evolutionists almost universally and repetitiously proclaim that modern neo-darwinian evolutionary theory is supported by overwhelming evidence and that there is no evidence for biblical creation (or even mere intelligent design) for that matter.

  they will dogmatically claim that evolution receives universal support from all the real scientists and all the facts from genetics, biology, geology, paleontology, and every other ology that one can think of.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  This is the best recent book for “extincting” neo-Darwinian theory by showing that the deleterious mutation rates are vastly higher than evolution can allow for.

  This book is another pseudo-scientific junk publication stunt by creationists. All living things undergo mutations during their lifetime; some are benign, some are not and some are apparently irrelevant. If the individuals monitored live in a green valey, they will have less mutations than those next to a toxic waste dump site; no secret about poison being bad for you. So for the 100000th time, those mutations helpful to better adapt to the environment are most likely to be passed on to future generations. And someone put in this guy's religious head that evolution happens at the level of species over a time period of millions of years.

  A rouge writer will never "debunk" evolution while mixing fantasy with facts.
• 
  27

  Silent Lambs in Wikipedia to be deleted

  by Gerard in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there are a couple of jw zealots campaingning in wikipedia to delete the silent lambs article.

  i'd like to request your editing time in order to search for additional references to be included and make their censoring task imposible.

  thanks.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/silentlambs.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  I am sorry LADY lEE YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT - THIS SITE IS A GOOD ONE TO CITE AND OF COURSE rANDYS WWW.FREEMINDS.ORG

  Forums and most blogs are not acceptable references to be used by Wikipedia. However, enough reliable references have been introduced lately and most likely the administrators will reject the petition to delete it. Good job people!
• 
  44

  If you could play any instrument what would it be?

  by restrangled in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i have played the piano my entire life and never learned another....i so wish i could play the guitar.

  i would trade my piano in a minute for a good guitar and lessons.. how about you?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  The Irish bagpipes.
• 
  27

  Silent Lambs in Wikipedia to be deleted

  by Gerard in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there are a couple of jw zealots campaingning in wikipedia to delete the silent lambs article.

  i'd like to request your editing time in order to search for additional references to be included and make their censoring task imposible.

  thanks.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/silentlambs.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  Please go to this page and declare that you are against its deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Silentlambs

  and write a short statement to the effect that: The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—what counts is whether readers can verify that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. ([[WP:V]]).
• 
  27

  Silent Lambs in Wikipedia to be deleted

  by Gerard in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there are a couple of jw zealots campaingning in wikipedia to delete the silent lambs article.

  i'd like to request your editing time in order to search for additional references to be included and make their censoring task imposible.

  thanks.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/silentlambs.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Gerard

  In short, we have to find references to Silent Lambs other than Silent Lambs' website.