Mad Dawg
I have been trying to follow this thread but losing it a bit to be honest. Not quite sure where you are coming from. Are you saying that god is not complex, is complex in a way that we do not understand or is not complex in the sense he is not lots of intricate pieces that have to be put together in a certain order but rather of a complexity of a nature that cannot be thought of in a material sense? Not trying to be facetious here, just can't get it. If you are saying that you do not need complexity to generate complexity then you do not need god, which is all Dawkins is saying. I cannot see how that is evidence of the existence of god is unless I have missed a line of reasoning somewhere.