Posts by Dutch-scientist

144

Latest apostate warning in Feb 15 2011 Watchtower

by dozy in

andre, who had served jehovah for years, had the bitter experience of being led astray.

by apostate thinking.

he felt that having a quick look at an apostate web site would not be dangerous.he recalls: initially, i was attracted to the so-called truths that the.

Dutch-scientist

The WTS descripes here perfectly what we called in science the Stockholm syndrome.

Even Andre read's Apostate material he keep postive feelings for his Captor the WTS.

Mostly he is a In-Born or get early in his child years contact with the WTS as result Phobias. Look arround of the JW's you know, how many are scared for Insects, Dogs, Hight, small rooms etc.

Problem is with In-Borns is that the dont have an reference of living without the WTS. They have fear to step out.

For the Born-ins on this site i am happy that you made the step beacuse it takes a lot of faith and energie to do it.

DS

8

Steven Weinberg on pre-big bang cosmos, physics and religion

by bohm in

jw
friends

i recently found an interview with steven weinberg http://richarddawkins.net/rdf_productions/steven_weinberg which i would strongly recommend.

steven weinberg is not the average run-of-the-mill theoretical physics nobel-prize winner, but would easily be in my top-5 greatest physicists of the 20th century.. dont get scared by richard dawkins -- he dont get to say a whole lot and weinberg has imho a much more agreeable belief on atheism.

he also tell dawkins off in video 8 :-).

Dutch-scientist

Yeah Weinberg talks about GOD or G.O.D. outside you can hear the thunder. They will make jokes of it.

But the real conversation is priceless on mine point of view.

DS

8

Steven Weinberg on pre-big bang cosmos, physics and religion

by bohm in

jw
friends

i recently found an interview with steven weinberg http://richarddawkins.net/rdf_productions/steven_weinberg which i would strongly recommend.

steven weinberg is not the average run-of-the-mill theoretical physics nobel-prize winner, but would easily be in my top-5 greatest physicists of the 20th century.. dont get scared by richard dawkins -- he dont get to say a whole lot and weinberg has imho a much more agreeable belief on atheism.

he also tell dawkins off in video 8 :-).

Dutch-scientist

The Thunder was funny in the first part.

8

Steven Weinberg on pre-big bang cosmos, physics and religion

by bohm in

jw
friends

i recently found an interview with steven weinberg http://richarddawkins.net/rdf_productions/steven_weinberg which i would strongly recommend.

steven weinberg is not the average run-of-the-mill theoretical physics nobel-prize winner, but would easily be in my top-5 greatest physicists of the 20th century.. dont get scared by richard dawkins -- he dont get to say a whole lot and weinberg has imho a much more agreeable belief on atheism.

he also tell dawkins off in video 8 :-).

Dutch-scientist

H Bohm,

This is funny I just post this kind of theory(Pre Big Bang situtions) on a Dutch Forum.

I will take a look at this now.

Cheers,

DS

248

H. Hunger Reviews R. Furuli's "Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian Chronology, Volume II"

by AnnOMaly in

a long-awaited review by professor h. hunger, foremost authority on babylonian astronomical cuneiform tablets, of dr. r. furuli's assyrian, babylonian, and egyptian chronology.

volume ii of assyrian, babylonian, egyptian, and persian chronology compared with the chronology of the bible is now available to read for anyone who is interested.

you can find it at http://goto.glocalnet.net/kf4/reviewhunger.htm.

Dutch-scientist

Hi thetrueone,

I know this story well. My point is that Belshazzar was no King only he received some kingship from his Father. So thats why Belshassar is not on a king list.

As example I try to say before Nebukadnessar was official King he won a battle agianst Egypt and make Jehoiakim as vassal king probaly take daniel and others with him. ( 3rd or 4th reign year of Jehoiakim )Then he heard that his father died and then Nebukadnessar go back to babylon and after two weeks when he arrived he was made a king of Babylon.

So we might believed that daniel wrote his book with the counting method from Babylon. This means after his 3 years education think he learned the method.

If we look at Daniel 1: no reign year was mentioned of Nebukadnessar but only from jehoiakim 3rd year. So Nebukadnessar was named King but not crowned yet.

248

H. Hunger Reviews R. Furuli's "Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian Chronology, Volume II"

by AnnOMaly in

a long-awaited review by professor h. hunger, foremost authority on babylonian astronomical cuneiform tablets, of dr. r. furuli's assyrian, babylonian, and egyptian chronology.

volume ii of assyrian, babylonian, egyptian, and persian chronology compared with the chronology of the bible is now available to read for anyone who is interested.

you can find it at http://goto.glocalnet.net/kf4/reviewhunger.htm.

Dutch-scientist

WTS loves to tell again and again the story of Belshazzar but making an complete mess with Nebukadnessar.

Does the WTS know the difference between being an King or (entrusted) having kingship.

Like Nebukadnessar he fight at Carchemisch agianst Farao Necho. At that time he has the kingship because his father has healthy problems.

After his father died what was after the battle he did go to babylon and then he was made to an official King of Babylon.

50

Eliminating all traces of exJWs

by Scully in

does anyone know if it is common practice for jws to take down or remove photos of dfd or dad family members within their homes?.

if so, is there any basis for this practice within wt literaturetm?

or is it simply a matter of "going beyond the things written" in order to hurt and disrespect the target, and extended family members who have close ties to the target?.

Dutch-scientist

I know JW who wont accept an friendship on facebook with a person who has DFd persons in his friendship list.

248

H. Hunger Reviews R. Furuli's "Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian Chronology, Volume II"

by AnnOMaly in

a long-awaited review by professor h. hunger, foremost authority on babylonian astronomical cuneiform tablets, of dr. r. furuli's assyrian, babylonian, and egyptian chronology.

volume ii of assyrian, babylonian, egyptian, and persian chronology compared with the chronology of the bible is now available to read for anyone who is interested.

you can find it at http://goto.glocalnet.net/kf4/reviewhunger.htm.

Dutch-scientist

Spade,

You say: rubbish + Bible info = truth hahahahah LOL

248

H. Hunger Reviews R. Furuli's "Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian Chronology, Volume II"

by AnnOMaly in

a long-awaited review by professor h. hunger, foremost authority on babylonian astronomical cuneiform tablets, of dr. r. furuli's assyrian, babylonian, and egyptian chronology.

volume ii of assyrian, babylonian, egyptian, and persian chronology compared with the chronology of the bible is now available to read for anyone who is interested.

you can find it at http://goto.glocalnet.net/kf4/reviewhunger.htm.

Dutch-scientist

Dear Spade,

If the secular history is rubbish then the fall of babylon in 539BCE and return of Jews 537 BCE (WTS point of view) is also rubbish!

248

H. Hunger Reviews R. Furuli's "Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian Chronology, Volume II"

by AnnOMaly in

a long-awaited review by professor h. hunger, foremost authority on babylonian astronomical cuneiform tablets, of dr. r. furuli's assyrian, babylonian, and egyptian chronology.

volume ii of assyrian, babylonian, egyptian, and persian chronology compared with the chronology of the bible is now available to read for anyone who is interested.

you can find it at http://goto.glocalnet.net/kf4/reviewhunger.htm.

Dutch-scientist

The WT uses Strm.Kambys.400 to get to 539BCE indirectly. If someone says VAT4956 is wrong how on earth they can use Strm.Kambys.400?!?

Strm.Kambys.400 pointed out in 1903 by F. X. Kugler that a part is a true copy an a other part the copiest made an mess of it. However it support the 539BCE.

BTW I am new here.

DS