Gladiator .. My personal view is that they should all sit on their hands, their own hands that is, not each others.
lol, this made me chuckle!
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
Gladiator .. My personal view is that they should all sit on their hands, their own hands that is, not each others.
lol, this made me chuckle!
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
Debator?renai... where in the scriptures does it command to not show affection during a prayer? or where is the principal?
And before you answer this, its a warm embrace or hands held during a prayer , its not a 'sexual' thing! Where is the scriptual guidance on such thing? Is it in the same place where it tells you report the hours you cover on the ministry each month? Or maybe the same place that it tells you not to celebrate birthdays, but its ok to wear a wedding band, despite both having pagan origins?
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
'public prayers' at the meetings must be wrong too then, and almost like the pharisees!
............and really believe that it is right that god will destroy them soon?.
a baby is a beutiful, innocent vulnerable little human being.
how can they really believe that it is right and just that god destroys millions of babies and children?.
I trust Jehovah and his son Jesus that however harsh Armegeddon is, not one single innocent life will be destroyed and many will get a life that was denied them previously. And I think you'll find all witnesses feel this way....Debator/?
I think you will find that not all witnesses feel this way and echo OUTLAW.. we have been told many times to 'think about our childrens lives' when making our decison to leave the 'truth'. As if we are leaving 'Gods organisation' We are saying GOODBYE to life, and Jehovah will NOT look favourably upon us.
I like those tho that like you like to justify stayin in an org that is so clearly warped, by genuinly believing ' its all gonna turn out ok in the end'. (deep down knowing and believing that alot of the teachings are truely judgemental and clearly wrong).
It shows you are a decent person with a heart really.
All the best Renai!
..
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
Yeah, cuz so many people are breaking the door down to get into KH's...
lol poopsiecakes, good point
............and really believe that it is right that god will destroy them soon?.
a baby is a beutiful, innocent vulnerable little human being.
how can they really believe that it is right and just that god destroys millions of babies and children?.
Yeah letsslatejw's i heard this too, but then somewhere along the line the thought changed then it changed again and again... i think anything that is concieved is now classed as a life and will therefore be ressurected, breath or no breath.. (many i know have drawn comfort from this having suffered a miscarriage)... but once again, the goalposts change so many times these poor individuals are probably elated one minute then stomped on the next minute!
Still , doesnt seem logical to me also that a loving God would kill innocent babies... someone once told a friend of mine, tho that he did it in noahs day, and at the time of soddom and gomorrah, so he will do it again.... hmmmm... scare mongering perhaps? wheres the facts?... DEBATOR/whoever youare??!!
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
'sisters' must not wear make up as it is a reflection of jezabel ... lol, watch this space!
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
'discreet' holding hands is ok.... odd
Tho i can see the point of the link up thing, Like a whole row of people linking arms and people visiting for the first time are bound to think (and in some cases correctly) what a bunch of weirdo's, and be put off ever going back!
............and really believe that it is right that god will destroy them soon?.
a baby is a beutiful, innocent vulnerable little human being.
how can they really believe that it is right and just that god destroys millions of babies and children?.
to Debator, what is your view on what i said about the resurrection of unborn babies or still borns?? Many 'sisters' are already talking about the amount of motherless baby they are going to 'adopt'... How is this logical when God is gonna just kill 'innocent' babies at armageddon? whats the point? Why not just keept them all alive seen as he will ressurect those that have died before armageddon..still births, miscarriages etc?
Do you not agree that it sounds a little bit pointless?
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true???
i have not heard of this before?
when did this happen?
... is this "no holding hands in prayers" law really true??? I have not heard of this before? When did this happen? anyone attending meetings at mo that was at the meeting that addressed this issue? And was it just your cong that made this rule up or the WT?
I am just intrigued.. surely not... it sounds so ridiculous???