MR,
Just paste the earlier comment you are interested in responding to and share your thoughts.
TD
For young earth creationists, that idea could be used to explain how God created male and female on the same 24 hour day.
i just picked up a few from mark jones as follows:.
i see is that the vast majority of jws don't seem to understand what their religion actually teaches.. the more controversial or embarrassing doctrine - although still official doctrine that has never been rescinded - is just not talked about anymore in the magazines.
there are dinosaurs living on venus.https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/2fowhx/dinosaurs_on_venus/.
MR,
Just paste the earlier comment you are interested in responding to and share your thoughts.
TD
For young earth creationists, that idea could be used to explain how God created male and female on the same 24 hour day.
can you add to this:.
"does anything about your religion trouble you as a jehovah’s witness or is it all good?
some of the things that would trouble me if i were a jehovah’s witness would include:.
Can you add to this:
"Does anything about your religion trouble you as a Jehovah’s Witness or is it all good?"
Some of the things that would trouble me if I were a Jehovah’s Witness would include:
a. the fact that every teaching that is unique to Jehovah's Witnesses is not in the Bible.
b. the fact that 99% of Jehovah’s Witnesses today are not saved, justified from all sin, imputed the righteousness of Christ, or access to the New Covenant.
c. the fact that I could not come to Jesus Christ and share my burdens with him and worship him as the angels in heaven, the wise men and his disciples did and all of creation will do to the glory of God the Father. Rev. 5:11–14
d. the fact that I would have to shun my adult children if they lost faith in the leadership of the Society and disassociated themselves.
e. the fact that I would be spreading a false unbiblical gospel that does not save anyone and affiliates people with an organization, but not to Christ.
anyone who has been of this forum in the past few days has seen doubting thomas (an active jw) refuse over and over to provide even one scripture that can show how a jw can get their sins forgiven while outside of the new covenant as described in mt.
26: 27-28. yet, he claims to believe in the blood covering of jesus while at the same time personally rejecting the new covenant "for forgiveness of sins".
his contradictory claims are common among jw's.
FFGhost
I thought the sins of the other sheep were absolved by their own death, not Christ's death on their behalf.
You can't have it both ways.
By the way, there is no forgiveness without the shedding of blood..so whose blood was shed for their forgiveness? If you say Christ's, then they are in the New Covenant.
i just picked up a few from mark jones as follows:.
i see is that the vast majority of jws don't seem to understand what their religion actually teaches.. the more controversial or embarrassing doctrine - although still official doctrine that has never been rescinded - is just not talked about anymore in the magazines.
there are dinosaurs living on venus.https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/2fowhx/dinosaurs_on_venus/.
How about a million cash?
watchtower view on romans 6: 7 examined .
the watchtower teaches that the opportunity to be born again and enjoy complete justification with god ended in 1935, having been limited to only 144k since pentecost.
so, it is very surprising that the watchtower embraces the death that is described in romans chapter 6, since this is the very death that is required to be born again…… which is denied to watchtower members!
Death does not absolve anyone from sins committed in this life
Matthew 12:36 -37 36 But I tell you that everyone will have to give account on the day of judgment for every idle word they have spoken. 37 For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.” NIV
Self-atonement is part and parcel of the Watchtower gospel.
i just picked up a few from mark jones as follows:.
i see is that the vast majority of jws don't seem to understand what their religion actually teaches.. the more controversial or embarrassing doctrine - although still official doctrine that has never been rescinded - is just not talked about anymore in the magazines.
there are dinosaurs living on venus.https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/2fowhx/dinosaurs_on_venus/.
Great stuff guys. I seem to remember one about the size and shape of ones brain being a factor of intelligence or spirituality. Something like that.
i just picked up a few from mark jones as follows:.
i see is that the vast majority of jws don't seem to understand what their religion actually teaches.. the more controversial or embarrassing doctrine - although still official doctrine that has never been rescinded - is just not talked about anymore in the magazines.
there are dinosaurs living on venus.https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/2fowhx/dinosaurs_on_venus/.
I just picked up a few from Mark Jones as follows:
I see is that the vast majority of JWs don't seem to understand what their religion actually teaches.
The more controversial or embarrassing doctrine - although still official doctrine that has never been rescinded - is just not talked about anymore in the magazines. Such as:
There are dinosaurs living on Venus.https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/2fowhx/dinosaurs_on_venus/
If someone tries to rape you, you must treat them with understanding.
Treat Him Respectfully - The intended victim should remember that the rapist is a human. No doubt there are circumstances in his life that have precipitated his behavior. So although a woman should not cower in fear and permit a rapist to intimidate her, at the same time she should treat him understandingly, as a fellow human. - Awake! 22 Feb 1984[2]
Whether to own a pocket calculator is a conscience matter that a Christian should weigh.[3]
You should kill yourself rather than have your tonsils out.
"If any overzealous doctor condemns your tonsils go and commit suicide with a case-knife. It's cheaper and less painful." - Golden Age 1926 Apr 7 p.438
As I said, these teachings have never been rescinded. Therefore, they’re still official doctrine of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Crazy, no?
If the governing body of Jehovah’s Witnesses were open and honest about what their religion actually teaches you wouldn't have JWs embarrassing themselves by giving contradicting answers which means I have to step in and school them all by showing them their own literature.
You know, like a cult?
Footnotes
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/2fowhx/dinosaurs_on_venus/
[2] https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/101984128
[3] https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/101976646
[4] Mark Jones's answer to What do the Jehovah's Witnesses believe?
hae anyone come across a quotation to that effect?.
Just saw this now.
Thanks TD. It is an excellent example.
Edit:
I just sent the URL to the JW involved and will await his response.
mcfree v. watchtower.
a us federal judge has ruled against watch tower pennsylvania, denying their dmca subpoena to identify the creator of the jehovah's witness parody videos known as "dubtown.. .
see last page (page 20).
Welcome to the forum Foxie. Hope to hear more of your story as you feel led.
mcfree v. watchtower.
a us federal judge has ruled against watch tower pennsylvania, denying their dmca subpoena to identify the creator of the jehovah's witness parody videos known as "dubtown.. .
see last page (page 20).
Here is the Dubtown Bottlegate URL