Someone on this forum a while back posted the following litany of WTS assumptions related tp 1914
Assumption 1: Nebuchadnezzar’s dream from Daniel
chapter 4 has a fulfillment beyond his day.
The book of Daniel makes no mention whatsoever of any
fulfillment beyond his day. There is no indication that what happened
to Nebuchadnezzar is some type of prophetic drama or minor
fulfillment to a major future antitype.
Assumption 2: The seven times of the dream are
meant to represent 360 years each.
When this formula applies elsewhere in the Bible, the
year-for-a-day ratio is explicitly stated or clearly implied. Here we
are assuming that it applies.
Assumption 3: This prophecy applies to the
enthronement of Jesus Christ.
The point of this dream and its subsequent
fulfillment was to provide an object lesson to the King, and mankind
in general, that rulership and the appointment of a ruler is the sole
prerogative of Jehovah God. There is nothing to indicate that the
enthronement of the Messiah is indicated here. Even if it is, there
is nothing to indicate that this is a calculation given to show us
when that enthronement takes place.
Assumption 4: This prophecy was given to establish
the chronological extent of the appointed times of the nations.
There is only one reference to the appointed times of
the nations in the Bible. At Luke
21:24 Jesus made no
connection whatsoever between this phrase and anything contained in
the book of Daniel.
Assumption 5: The appointed times of the nations
began when Jerusalem was destroyed and the Jews were taken into exile
in Babylon.
There is nothing in the Bible to indicate when the
appointed times of the nations began, so this is pure speculation.
Assumption 6: The 70 years refers to 70 years in
which Jerusalem would be destroyed.
Based on the wording of the Bible, the 70 years could
refer to years in which the Jews were under the rule of Babylon. This
would include the servitude when the nobles, including Daniel
himself, were taken to Babylon, but the rest were allowed to stay and
pay tribute to the King of Babylon. (Jer.
25:11–12)
Assumption 7: 607 B.C.E. is the year Jerusalem was
destroyed and Judah’s king slain and the appointed times of the
nations began.
Scholars agree on two years: 587 B.C.E. as the year
of Jerusalem’s destruction, and 539 B.C.E. as the year in which
Babylon fell. There is no more reason to accept 539 B.C.E. as valid
then there is to accept 607 B.C.E. for Jerusalem’s destruction.
Assumption 8: 1914 marks the end of the trampling
of Jerusalem and therefore the end of the appointed times of the
nations.
There is no evidence that the trampling of Jerusalem
by the nations ended in 1914.
Assumption 9: Satan and his demons were cast down
in 1914.
Witnesses contend that Satan caused the First World
War out of anger for being cast down. However, he was cast down in
October of 1914 according to WTS interpretation, and yet the war
began in August of that year and preparations for the war had been
going on for a considerable time before that, as early as 1911. That
would mean he had to get angry before he was cast down and the woe to
the earth began before he was cast down.
Assumption 10: The presence of Jesus Christ is
invisible and is separate from his coming at Armageddon.
There is strong evidence in the Bible that the
presence of Christ and his arrival at Armageddon are one and the
same. There is no hard evidence to indicate that Jesus would rule
from heaven invisibly for over 100 years before manifesting himself
visibly prior to the destruction of this old system of things.
Assumption 11: The injunction against Jesus’
followers getting knowledge of his installation as king as stated at
Acts
1:6, 7
was lifted for Christians in our day.
This statement of Jesus would mean that the apostles
of his day had no right to know when he would be enthroned as king of
Israel–spiritual or otherwise. The meaning of Daniel’s prophecy
of the 7 times was supposedly hidden from them. Yet, the significance
of the 2,520
years was revealed to William Miller,
the founder of the Seventh Day Adventists in the early part of the
19th Century? That would mean the injunction was lifted for
Christians in our day. Where in the Bible does it indicate that
Jehovah has changed on this position and granted us foreknowledge of
such times and seasons?
In Summation
To base the interpretation
of a prophetic fulfillment on even one assumption opens the door for
disappointment. If that one assumption is wrong, then the
interpretation must fall by the wayside. Here we have 11 assumptions!
What are the odds that all 11 are true?