From my perspective both "The Dishonest Steward" and :The Rich Man and Lazarus" accounts are satirical. They wete designed to undermine Pharisaic authority in the eyes of the common people in the audience.
In order to establish that the literary form of both narratives are satires, or more particularly, parodies, there must be clear evidence that:
a. A common or "well known story line is being imitated".
b. irony is employed; that the story’s outcome is changed such that there is clear “incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the expected result”
c. the unexpected results "highlight human stupidity" or corruption.
d. "a comic end is served", the purpose of which is to cause listeners "to detach sympathies from certain people (groups), to judge their actions and to see the absurdity in their behavior…
As it happens, The Dishonest Steward (Pharisees) get divine congratulations and the rich man (Pharisees) end up in their own version of hell in the afterlife.
It is clear why the Pharisees would not appreciate these accounts.
Check out my YT video