Hi Duran,
I prefaced my response by saying, let's break this down a little. Many don't appreciate long posts. And since I believe I have the truth on Matthew 24, I tend to stick to Matthew 24, it’s parallel texts and include the book of Daniel because it is referred to in Olivet discourse itself.
So let's look at Matthew 24:30 now.
30. AND THEN SHALL APPEAR THE SIGN OF THE SON OF MAN IN HEAVEN: AND THEN SHALL ALL THE TRIBES OF THE EARTH MOURN, AND THEY SHALL SEE THE SON OF MAN COMING IN THE CLOUDS OF HEAVEN WITH POWER AND GREAT GLORY. (See Jer.21:5 Is.19:1)
Note that it is "the sign of the Son of Man in heaven", not the Son of man visiting the earth. At the destruction of Jerusalem, the sign or precursor to His coming to destroy was found in the fulfillment of these predicted calamities and finally the surrounding of Jerusalem by the Roman armies. Of course as these calamities and ultimate destruction, befell them, the tribes would mourn. The Jews were eventually left without temple, city, sacrifice or priesthood as was prophesied by Daniel.
AND THEY SHALL SEE THE SON OF MAN COMING IN THE CLOUDS OF HEAVEN WITH POWER AND GREAT GLORY.
Does the phrase "coming (not parousia) in the clouds" necessarily refer to a personal coming to earth? We should not read that thought into the text.
Is. 19:1 states "See the Lord rides on a swift cloud and is coming to Egypt: and the idols of Egypt shall be moved at His presence, and the heart of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it" Although this verse speaks of the Lord riding on a cloud and of His presence, we know that the Egyptians did not see the Lord in a personal and visible way. The expression is rather used to indicate a coming in judgment against Egypt. Jesus coming in the clouds against Israel thus refers to a similar kind of judgment.
The clouds of heaven obscure or shut heaven from man's view. They were to see the Lord Jesus coming to judgment with power. This power was manifest in the destruction. The word glory refers to the visible display of his honor, power and majesty. That Jesus destroyed the city in 70 AD is accurate. As Daniel 9:27 reveals; because of the over spreading of abominations, he, the Lord and Messiah himself would make it desolate. Titus was merely his instrument.
Seems to me that Jesus word to the high priest was fulfilled in AD 70 as well.
Matthew 26:64 KJV — Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.