Catfish!!!
34 years old, saying "Hit me up". Riiiggght.
hi,.
im 34/m/idaho looking to chat/cam with female that is also looking for the same.. hit me up, looks forward to meeting you.. chris .
Catfish!!!
34 years old, saying "Hit me up". Riiiggght.
this has been announced on the jw's official website, in the "jw news" section.
this is not a joke.
anthony moron da turd is out as a gluttonous body member!
Actually, Tony decided to reapportion funds, without GB approval, originally donated to the world wide work, to his new Tshirt line featuring "#JW4Life" and "#ThugJW" designs. Also, he produced a new JW rap album titled : "Everlasting Jams".
original reddit post (removed).
Two minds think alike. He's definitely come out of one cult and embraced the cult of woke.
I just figure that he could possibly, finally obtain mastery over his penis if he cut it off.
this has been announced on the jw's official website, in the "jw news" section.
this is not a joke.
anthony moron da turd is out as a gluttonous body member!
Actually, it was revealed that he maintained a very lucrative OnlyFans account where he appeared as a masked character with handle "ZorroFantacy4527".
i remember having read somewhere, but i cannot find it anymore, that it is possible to debunk the 1914 calculus using only jw publications, like "insight on the scriptures" (chronologies) for example.. do you have any sources about that to suggest to me?.
thanks..
True
this has been announced on the jw's official website, in the "jw news" section.
this is not a joke.
anthony moron da turd is out as a gluttonous body member!
Next theory:
AMIII realized that taking a position on vaccines was counterproductive, and started to advocate for returning to normalcy. Figuring people need to get back to door-to-door, he proposed a full reversal on vaccine policy.
The other members didn't want to give up the fear control. AM called them all tyrant libtards during one GB meeting, and from there his fate was sealed.
this has been announced on the jw's official website, in the "jw news" section.
this is not a joke.
anthony moron da turd is out as a gluttonous body member!
He got in trouble for same reason every one gets in trouble : addiction to hard-core snuff porn.
original reddit post (removed).
When is he going to come out as trans?
i remember having read somewhere, but i cannot find it anymore, that it is possible to debunk the 1914 calculus using only jw publications, like "insight on the scriptures" (chronologies) for example.. do you have any sources about that to suggest to me?.
thanks..
So, before designing the programs for the different astronomical charts, all the software engineers from around the world got together in order to create a consiracy just to discredit 607 BCE?
It seems that way. Like I said, if it were possible to time travel, he would then argue we didn't do the time traveling correctly. We would have to form some sort of committee to come up with the right procedure to time travel - you know, press the buttons the same way or something.
i remember having read somewhere, but i cannot find it anymore, that it is possible to debunk the 1914 calculus using only jw publications, like "insight on the scriptures" (chronologies) for example.. do you have any sources about that to suggest to me?.
thanks..
You raised the contention not myself for I simply quoted COJ's statement that he presents 17 lines of evidence that establishes the chronology of the NB Period consequently the dates 586/7BCE as Neb's 18th year are established for the Fall of Jerusalem. Whether COJ has succeeded in this attempt is open to criticism and is refuted by the research of Rolf Furuli. who has shown that the Chronology for the NB Period is short by at least 20 years.
In contrast, rather than relying on the chronology of the NB Period in order to fix a date for the Fall of Jerusalem as is the COJ'S method, WT scholars have used the Bible and the biblical '70 years which clearly established that 607 BCE is the only date for the Fall of Jerusalem.
COJ's use of 17 lines of evidence holistically does not disprove 607 BCE because none of these lines of evidence uses any biblical data or reference and that applies to each one of those lines of evidence.