the magazine that they are studying in the congregation this month has an article at the back about how pornography in a marriage could damage the relationship.. there's one piece of advice that sounds rather scary, the wt suggests that the couple should "consider asking an elder with whom you are both comfortable to sit in and guide your discussions for a time.".
how many of you would want an elder present in your home while you and your partner discussed your personal sexual cravings and the type of porn videos being watched?.
How many of you would want an elder present in your home while you and your partner discussed your personal sexual cravings and the type of porn videos being watched?
Yes. Also, what type of elder would accept such a request? Seems to me that as soon as the trusted elder accepted the request, he should no longer be trusted.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
How would someone in Croatia, upon getting a criminal conviction for speech in Croatia, put a US citizen in prison or even collect on the judgement?
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
Perhaps one of his supporters can ask the obvious question- why didn't you already have this evidence ready during the 15 months of waiting?
It's tough to find time to look for non-existant evidence when you spend 98% of your day masterbating to Thai porn.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
9. Claims that I personally confirmed and admitted all the allegations made by Kim Silvio...
Lmao. He literally did that, and more, on the video that he, I'm sure, left out of evidence.
Question: Are his financial statements public record now?
Also, since when are "insinuations" basis for libel or defamation?
what the jw sect has become and is slowly becoming is far more near what i thought could be a good religion based on the bible.. no more counting hours and no more blindly following direction now they admit they are not inspired.. i would like to design a new sect inside the jws.
it has to be kept secret because the elders would not like it.. this new sect involves giving a tick every month or so saying you are still kindof active talking about the bible.. going to meetings occasionally and attending on zoom sometimes.
very rarely go to ministry groups but don’t ever do first call, just say you are doing street work and have a nice walk somewhere maybe the shops or the park.
I think I might combine my Mustardarian rituals with Simon's, clearly righteous, religion.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
"Woke" is an ideology. It's ultimately a Marxist ideology. It seeks to tear down, through dialectical means, through struggle sessions - but it's all culturally based. It's cancerous.
But not being woke doesn't mean you are virtuous. It just means you aren't a useful idiot for literally destroying civil society.
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
One thing that tends to get blown away here is when you claim ex-JWs are just in a different cult now. Same thing happened with politics. Just don't do that. Disagreement doesn't mean we are in a cult.
It's not evidence that anything is false, especially evolution.
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
If I give evidence that evolution is untrue, it will be censored.
You are conflating "censored" and "refuted".
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
(I do believe in one kind of evolution: Eventually evolutionary theorist cultists evolve into communists or socialists.)
Ridiculous. The above statement has about as much meaning as saying "eventually everyone that eats chocolate cake becomes socialist".
Your entire world view seems to be one giant non-sequitor.
re-posting this for reference.. #1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
The BITE model has been deployed quite frequently, on this forum, as a smear. Even Hassan applied it inappropriately, when he realized it was a good tool for bashing people of the opposite political persuasion. It's like calling people racist. "Cult" and "racism" have specific meanings, none of which apply to the work of biologists. It's just another way of verbally degrading someone that you disagree with.
Which is why "fuck off" is the appropriate response.
