i know that there is no mention of any birthday celebrations in the bible besides the two which were celebrated by non-believers.
and it just so happened that on each of these events, someone died (one non-believer and one believer).
but does it mean that just because the bible mentions these two events, that all birthday celebrations are forbidden?
@Scully: A fitting article! May Jah prove to always be with us as we keep our bodies free from defilement. For those of us tempted to take a shit, may Jehovah provide the strength to "prairie dog" it, and then finally vanquish the urge to "ease nature".
MeanMrMustard
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@shamus: if you wait long enough, my cat will again push his way into my face... perhaps on my keyboard... and then some magic might happen.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@sizemik:
You will notice at this point that the calendar is only active from this day forward . . . that's because it's a schedule and does not retain old schedules or archives for decided or dismissed cases. You can however check the current list for format.
Yes. I agree. See my posts above that duplicate your results. Having historical results would have helped... wonder why they do not have historical data? It's not like its going to consume a lot of database space.... sheesh
MeanMrMustard
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@all:
Alright, so I was able to verify FUTURE cases on the offical Magistrates' site. It looks like the offical site lists only FUTURE cases. The non-official domain is in tied to IP: 203.0.178.91
Located in South Austrailia. Could still be phishing site, but it is starting to look more like a historical site for case listings??
MeanMrMustard
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@talesin: Yes, I have 4 cats. Most sleep the day away. One in particular insists on being in my face 24/7.
MeanMrMustard
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
ooops, my last post belonged to my cat... Jumped on my keyboard ... I can't edit it for some reason
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@talesin:
I have read the thread. A site was given that was not the offical Magistrates' Court of Victoria site. Are you are referring to this site:
http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/
That domain is in question. ozehosting.com and ozehosting.com.au are not offical sites. I was looking for verification from the offical site:
http://www.magistratescourt.vic.gov.au/
MeanMrMustard
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@all:
Ok, I see what's going on here... potentially. After looking through the official site for a while, I found the case hearing search, and the list. It looks like the only thing listed on the official site are current future hearing dates (that is cases with a hearing date within the next 6 months). Doing a basic search for any date in the past, even yesterday, reveals no cases - which is clearly wrong. You can't search historically from the offical site.
MeanMrMustard
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@all:
Just a note: the link I just posted was from WitnessMyFury's post. It seems to show a newpaper article verifying there was some legal action in Oz over WWC.
Another note: I can't find any case number from the "fake" site in the "real" site, and I can't find any case number from the "real" site in the "fake" site. So the case numbers just aren't working out.
MeanMrMustard