Can you explain REV 20:5?
Do you or don't you believe in the rapture?
wouldnt Fredie Franz warned you about child abusers in the cong if he is heaven already?
what question would you ask geoffrey jackson, as a member of the governing body of jehovah's witnesses, to answer?
.
jw leaks.
Can you explain REV 20:5?
Do you or don't you believe in the rapture?
wouldnt Fredie Franz warned you about child abusers in the cong if he is heaven already?
yes or no.......what say you?.
i'll start - no!.
.
as the story of "annointed" ones goes.....when their spouse is left behind on earth, are they free to remarry?
that would kinda suck, being in heaven...watching the wifey , or hubby gettin doinked by someone new.
just sayin.....shewt...i got way too much time on my hands..
Sex, there going to be flying around with JC. What a privilege to do that. Maybe they will fly down and sit and watch to make sure the wife doesn't brake any bedroom laws. If they do he will slaughter them.
My taughts
it seems they do have a database!
!you can view it here on the royal commission website:.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
we haven't been to a meeting or jw event in several years.
we have been following the rc closely.
it is fascinating!
hey, hey geoffrey j,.
will you testify today?.
hey, hey geoffrey j,.
They rather pay 13 million dollars then let their GB members testify ask Irwin Zalkin.
Mr Jackson has no compassion for the victims so we don't show him any either.
i thought i'd post something that breaks from the ongoing australian slaughter house lol.. so let's pretend we are doing the new thursday night item that has replaced local needs.
how has jehovah helped you?
(translated you should be effing thankfull to us 7 men!
it seems like there has not been as much discussion here about the rc testimony on day 6 (4th august) as there has been about previous days.
i was quite surprised by rodney spinks' testimony, which was a marked contrast to the bungling and inarticulate testimony of the elders that appeared before him.
spinks seemed reasonably co-operative, and a lot more willing to concede points than anyone else has been.
@orphancrow he also said that 400 were familial so it's ok to abuse your own family I didn't get why he said that.
one thing that I found interesting is that he mention how the branch comitee in the pass week have discuss changes. So they are admitting that there policies are flawed.
it seems like there has not been as much discussion here about the rc testimony on day 6 (4th august) as there has been about previous days.
i was quite surprised by rodney spinks' testimony, which was a marked contrast to the bungling and inarticulate testimony of the elders that appeared before him.
spinks seemed reasonably co-operative, and a lot more willing to concede points than anyone else has been.
the gb needs to be subpenaed to testify just like losch was.
the commission needs to subpena each one individually and make separate fines when each one refuses.