They are constantly doing this and it is very deceitful. I think at times they also use this method to introduce new teachings or thoughts then wait some time to see how the idea is accepted and if it goes well then they start teaching the idea as an accepted doctrine.
The Watchtower article in your OP appears to be written to explain when the chosen ones were resurrected but also to explain how they knew the Great Crowd was identified around 1935. In order to substantiate their reasoning they introduce a new thought which is that the resurrected anointed are communicating with them. However, there are some serious problems which they may not have realized (or it may have been on purpose to see how the idea would go down).
In the Proclaimers book of 1993, page 708, they had clearly stated that this type of communication was out of the question by stating “those who
make up the one true Christian organization today do not have angelic
revelations or divine inspiration”
I've previously written some comments about this 2007 article and they are as follows -
The GB claim they are not inspired but only
directed by God's Holy spirit through diligent research, meditation and prayer
to come to understand the Bible. There is one particular teaching that the GB
admit that they believe their understandings are not known to them purely on
this basis and that is identifying the Great Crowd in 1935. It was around that
year that Rutherford believed the Great Crowd was being drawn to their
organization.
As we know, before
1935 all JWs (or bible students) were considered to be anointed with a heavenly
hope. How did Rutherford come to this knowledge? There is nothing
in the bible to back up this claim - that is there is nothing in the bible to
identify the year of 1935 or thereabouts (and there is still no specific date identified) as being the year that the Great Crowd would now come
into the congregations. There are no prophecies that the GB use to back the
claim, their is no time line and nothing in the bible that identifies this
period as being so significant.
God's Kingdom Rules Ch 5 states "In 1935 came a
brilliant flash of spiritual light. At the convention held in Washington, D.C.,
the great multitude was identified as an earthly class, the same as the sheep
in Jesus’ parable of the sheep and the goats."
How would he explain what
this brilliant flash of spiritual light actually is. No amount of research or
reading the bible would give Rutherford this brilliant flash because there is
nothing in there that supports the idea that they would be identified in 1935.
W 07 1/1 "11 What, then, can we deduce from the fact that one of the 24
elders identifies the great crowd to John? It seems that resurrected ones of
the 24-elders group may be involved in the communicating of divine truths
today. Why is that important? Because the correct identity of the great crowd
was revealed to God’s anointed servants on earth in 1935. If one of the 24
elders was used to convey that important truth, he would have had to be
resurrected to heaven by 1935 at the latest. That would indicate that the first
resurrection began sometime between 1914 and 1935. Can we be more
precise?"
This is an amazing claim. They are suggesting that the
resurrected anointed MAY be communicating truth's. For one thing, this means
that there is supernatural/spiritual/divine communication involved and they think this might be
the case. So they are going way beyond the idea that it is just HS guiding them
through research and clarity.
What is even more interesting is that they say
this may be the situation, they don't know for sure. In other words, they claim
that someone is communicating to them but they are not sure who it is. They would know for sure as to whether they are coming up with these ideas under their own steam or if it is coming to them through some other means. It clearly wasn't found in the Bible so it's coming from elsewhere. By acknowledging it might be from the resurrected anointed they are, as a consequence, acknowledging that it is coming from an external source by implication. They have identified that it is coming from supernatural means.
With
that being the case we know that if it was God doing this through HS then truth
would not change. Why would his lines of communication be faulty and shedding
bad light which later needs to be re communicated with complete reversals in
understanding?
They are not sure who is communicating to them, leaving us with only the information that is being communicated, from whatever source. Is it true or is it
sometimes incorrect? How do they know if what is being communicated is right or
wrong? They don't because the evidence shows that, at times, it needs
correcting or changing. Yet, and here is the big problem, they accept that
communication as being right regardless of not even knowing where it is coming
from or how they are receiving it.. This is really scary and a brave admittance
by the GB.
Back to this 1935 teaching. It was Rutherford that revealed this
idea. However, the 2007 article with all it's indecisive words, do not attribute the idea to him, or it even being a possibility. The GB still accept the concept as truth and they know that Rutherford was
wrong in other matters. They accept it today without any biblical basis but on the basis that it may be from a spiritual source. They have already shown that they accept lies as truth and think they only need to wait on God to reveal
corrections, it doesn't make sense. Are these corrections through the same source (the resurected anointed) that they are not even sure about or some other source? If their not sure who is communicating with them then how can anything be trusted other than what is clearly written and provable from the Bible?
It is pretty obvious to any Christian that receiving
communications from a supernatural source that proves to be false has to be
from Satan.