EasyPrompt, why should a person's reputation be undermined because they are ridiculing someone? You claim that happens every time.
In this scenario you need to look at who is doing the undermining, I don't know how desirable these people would be as good acquaintances.
I read this comment elsewhere and think it's great -
Is there a way to distinguish helpful and unhelpful ridicule? Heroic vs. over-the-line ridicule?
I don't doubt you would find some unhelpful ridicule on this thread but given that it provides many with a good laugh, it's debateable. However, there is so much that would be considered helpful and that could hardly be undermining the posters reputation, in fact, it is heroic and the reason it is seen as necessary.
You also mention a continuing cycle of hate. Where is this notion of 'continuing hate' come from?