It almost sounds like you are suggesting that they would have been better off under the British and that Ghandi shoudl have left well enough alone...
I am no fan of British imperialism, but I am less of a fan of the dark side of religion.
India and Pakistan have fought three wars since partition in addition to innumerable bloody skirmishes across their shared border. They are now poised to exterminate one another with their stockpiles of nuclear weapons. And how about this:
"Mothers were skewered on swords as their children watched. Young women were stripped and raped in broad daylight, then set on fire. A pregnant woman's belly was slit open, her fetus raised skyward on the tip of sword and then tossed onto one of the fires that blazed across the city." (C. W. Dugger, "Religious Riots Loom over Indian Politics," New York Times, July 27, 2002.)
This was just nine years ago, when a thousand people died in India in one month arguing over each others' religions. This is the legacy of God-inspired faith, PSac. Perhaps the country would have been better off under the Brits.