I have to get ready to go out soon, its just on 3.00 pm in Oz, and I want to got to a lecture at Sydney U at 6.00 pm and hopefully have coffee with a friend before, so I will make one short response now and respond as neccessary tomorrow.
Simon: Developed civilizations have to put pressure on developing people to make it clear what is and isn't acceptable and I think trade and publicity are valid weapons to do this.
You are free to view the problem from whatever perspective you choose and to believe in whatever actions you think will fix the problem.
But sometimes (speaking generally), with some problems, you cant just "tell" people what you consider is acceptable or not acceptable.
Japan is a reasonably wealthy nation, there is no reason why they need to kill whales and dolphins for food. But their response is, that they 'like' whale meat, and anyway (as far as Australia is concerned) why do you have to slaughter kangaroos, and not even for food (actually, it is for food, as kangaroos eat the grass that farmers want to keep to feed sheep and cattle).
So what's the next step - stop buying Japanese cars, or using electronic products (owned by the Japanese but made in China-smile).
Telling people what to do doesn't work.
I suggest that just as western values changed (think of Teddy Roosevelt acting like a big-game hunter in Africa in the early 20th C.) and became more compassionate toward animals, even though we still find people that abuse animals, so increasing prosperity will change the social values that make people appreciate other life forms. The idea, in a thread I posted, on seeing chimpanzees as 'persons' was not liked by some. But these discussions are part of the process by which social change occurs.
I suggest the problem of 'dogs' as food is a problem that will change. A few weeks ago, in Shanghai I watched each morning as pampered pooches were taken for a walk by their doting owners. One little thing walked in a set of four matching booties. I smiled at the sight, but another part of my mind objected, I'd rather the dog live a more 'natural' life, but how can a dog do that in a big city.
Anyway, for the record there were objections in China to the dog-meat festival in Yulin. The Australian Financial Review reported it this way:
Last year, an estimated 10,000 dogs were slaughtered for the celebration.
But this year, the festival has been mired in controversy as China’s army of netizens, among them animal rights activists and celebrities, armed with photographs of their cute dogs, launched a high-profile campaign to have it shut down.
This campaign has attracted its own backlash. Supporters of the festival say it is not breaking any Chinese laws and activists, particularly foreigners, should not be allowed to interfere with local customs and traditions. Tied up in the debate is China’s increasing openness to Western values and culture, which some believe is eroding its own identity.
“Eating or not eating dog meat is an old custom," said one dog-owner in a letter to theChina Daily. “We often apply modern standards to judge traditional customs and practices. Animal lovers, especially dog lovers, can stay away from dog meat, but they cannot force others to do the same. "
Link: http://www.afr.com/news/world/asia/chinese-debate-ethics-of-eating-dogs-20140620-je1su
BTW, the Chinese are not the only dog-eaters in the world, the (south) Koreans are also. What do you think should be done to force the Koreans to refrain from eating dog? A friend (whenever he returns to Korea) is fed dog-meat by his mother - to keep him healthy.