fulltimestudent

Joined

• started 752 topics
• posted 3,901 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by fulltimestudent

• 
  11

  The Jewish Temple(s) In Egypt. (Circa 5th Century BCE)

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the web address on the above sketch is misleading as the sketch (it seems) was included originally, in a article in a peer reviewed archaeological journal by a stephen rosenberg.. there is little doubt that the temple was genuine and it demonstrates that the ot stories about the role of egypt in the formation of judaism do not tell the truth about the complete relationship between israel and the egyptian empire.. we know that this temple on elephantine island was genuine.

  some papyrus correspondence has survived .

  there is also another (claimed) jewish temple that an archaelogical team explored last century, but the precise location has been lost.. more on the above temple tomorrow..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  Crazyguy : Could it be that many of the stories of the Jews in the Old Testament could be a throw back to a people called the Hyksos who conquered Egypt but were then pushed out by the Egyptians to settle in Jerusalem?

  That's the understanding presented by Josephus, but its a view disputed by some/many modern historians.

  Wikipedia has an entry on the hyksos, part of which states:

  Origin hypotheses[edit]
  Manetho and Josephus[edit]
  In his Against Apion, the 1st-century AD historian Josephus Flavius debates the synchronism between the Biblical account of the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt, and two Exodus-like events that the Egyptian historian Manetho apparently mentions. It is difficult to distinguish between what Manetho himself recounted, and how Josephus or Apion interpret him.
  Josephus identifies the Israelite Exodus with the first exodus mentioned by Manetho, when some 480,000 Hyksos, wrongly interpreted as "shepherd kings" by Josephus (also referred to as just as shepherds, as kings and as captive shepherds in his discussion of Manetho), left Egypt for Jerusalem.[8] The mention of Hyksos identifies this first exodus with the Hyksos period (16th century BC).
  Apion identifies a second exodus mentioned by Manetho when a renegade Egyptian priest called Osarseph led 80,000 "lepers" to rebel against Egypt. Apparently, Manetho conflates events of the Amarna period (in the 14th century) and the events at the end of the 19th Dynasty (12th century).[citation needed] Then, Apion additionally conflates these with the Biblical Exodus, and contrary to Manetho, even alleges that this heretic priest changed his name to Moses.[9] Many scholars[10][11] do not interpret lepers and leprous priests as literally referring to a disease, but rather to a strange and unwelcome new belief system.
  Josephus records the earliest account of the false but understandable etymology that the Greek phrase Hyksos stood for the Egyptian phrase Hekw Shasu meaning the Bedouin-like "Shepherd Kings", which scholars have only recently shown means "rulers of foreign lands".[12]
  

  
  Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_the_Hyksos

  Lots of references in that entry to check out at your leisure.

  In any case, the Hyksos only ruled a northern section of Egypt, and native (however you want to understand that term) kings ruled the remainder.
  

  In other periods of history, various Egyptian Empires ruled over the land of Israel.

  By the time, that this thread deals with, the Hyksos were long gone.
  
  
• 
  11

  The Jewish Temple(s) In Egypt. (Circa 5th Century BCE)

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the web address on the above sketch is misleading as the sketch (it seems) was included originally, in a article in a peer reviewed archaeological journal by a stephen rosenberg.. there is little doubt that the temple was genuine and it demonstrates that the ot stories about the role of egypt in the formation of judaism do not tell the truth about the complete relationship between israel and the egyptian empire.. we know that this temple on elephantine island was genuine.

  some papyrus correspondence has survived .

  there is also another (claimed) jewish temple that an archaelogical team explored last century, but the precise location has been lost.. more on the above temple tomorrow..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  

  The web address on the above sketch is misleading as the sketch (it seems) was included originally, in a article in a peer reviewed archaeological journal by a Stephen Rosenberg.

  There is little doubt that the temple was genuine and it demonstrates that the OT stories about the role of Egypt in the formation of Judaism do not tell the truth about the complete relationship between Israel and the Egyptian Empire.

  We know that this temple on Elephantine Island was genuine. Some papyrus correspondence has survived

  There is also another (claimed) Jewish temple that an archaelogical team explored last century, but the precise location has been lost.

  More on the above temple tomorrow.
• 
  7

  Jehovah`s Witnesses Religion based on First Century Christianity ?

  by smiddy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  who was the president of the first century christian congregation after jesus death , , the secretary ,the treasurer ,the field overseer ,the district overseer ,who were the lawyers protecting the congregations from secular authorities ,the mogul`s of real estate , buying up land and getting christians to build places of worship with free labor and then selling them off for a profit a few years down the track , with nothing going back to those who laboured on those projects .. where are the records on papyrus , that the 1st century witnesses counted their hours ,made return visits ,bible studies ,oops the bible wasnt even formulated then ,that didn`t occur until apostate christendom in the 3rd century came up with a number of books to be inspired ..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  Hi Smiddy!

  In answer to your rhetorical questions.

  May I suggest that it's likely a mistake to think of the past in terms used in the present. As my Ancient History teachers kept reminding us, "The past is another country, they do things differently there."

  Your OP asks:

  "Who was the president of the first Century christian Congregation after Jesus death , , the Secretary ,the Treasurer ,the Field Overseer ,the District Overseer"

  There are easy answers to those questions. Both the NT and other sources indicate James became the leader of the Jerusalem congregation, and after him other members of Jesus' family seem to have occupied that. All the functions we expect to see in an organisation today, can often be found in some parallel way in first/second century organisations. For example, Marty E.Stevens, two books will allow a reader to understand that religious organisations in the past were quite complex, as they are today

  
  

  Of course, modern religious organisations also have to respond to the increasing complexity of national laws and regulations and a Secretary of a large religious group will likely have to attempt to ensure compliance to those rules and regulations.

  As Stevens discusses, there were equivalents of accountants attached to both the Jerusalem Temple and most pagan temples in the West Asian/ Mediterranean world.Records were kept to account for everything

  As we understand the times, most meetings were held in house churches, often provided by high social status Christians. I think its reasonable to expect that membership contributions were accounted for separately from that patrons household accounts. If as some texts suggest, the early church supported some members (like widows) some records would have been kept. Later, after the legalisation of early Christianity the Emperor and his family began to provide the funds to build basilica's (churches) as meeting places. We can be confident that the Emperor's staff would've required an accounting of the funds provided.

  "were the Lawyers protecting the Congregations from secular Authorities."

  There were lawyers (of a sort) in the Roman Empire., and yes! we do have records of delegations to Rome to discuss legal problems with the government. And, after the 'legalisation' of the church, there were even more of these delegations as intra-church disputes over ownership of church buildings, who had to right to lead the local church, and doctrinal matters were sent up to the Emperor's staff for settlement.

  Were there Circuit/District overseers? Our best records demonstrate that there were people sent out as special representatives for a lot of reasons.

  The structures of both modern mainstream churches and the JWs reflect the need for a similar regulation of "religious" life and activity.

  I could keep going for page after page - we may like to imagine early worship as 'simple' but in fact it was often very complex. Think of Israelite religion, When David turned the Kingship over to Solomon there were 38,000 Levites serving a religious function including 4000 soer (that Stevens translates as 'gaters' (organisers). 1 Chronicles 26:14 says one of these soer was, 'an advisor with prudence,' make what you will of that term. It was not simple task to do all the things that Temple worship required, including getting rid of the blood and guts of sacrificed animals
• 
  6

  How to get rid of that unwanted drone.

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as thousands of drones are being bought by all kinds of people, sooner or later we may face a drone controlled by a moron annoying us.

  here's one solution.. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37528390.

  or, you can become a drone hunter, as in this yt video:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  zeb : concern here of quad-copters being flown near airports and safety issues with real planes but the concern is only that. But once they become popular then some govt dept will put in rules and licences which like so many things will only affect the obedient.

  Truly so, Zeb, and given the (occasional) problem with some half-brain aiming a laser at an aircraft, its probably only a matter of time before a drone collides with a landing/taking off aircraft.

  Me? I think they are great. Huge uses for fun and for farming looking for stock, aerial photography, looking for lost people etc.

  They are already demonstrating their usefulness in many areas. ... but, its the half-brains that will make them problematical. I'm not sure of the legality of the solutions in my first post. Say a neighbour purposely persistently flys a camera drone over my backyard's airspace - can I really destroy his property with impunity?

  Here's a list of what are claimed to be the best/most useful makers.

  http://www.airdronecraze.com/drone-makers-2016/
  
• 
  6

  How to get rid of that unwanted drone.

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as thousands of drones are being bought by all kinds of people, sooner or later we may face a drone controlled by a moron annoying us.

  here's one solution.. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37528390.

  or, you can become a drone hunter, as in this yt video:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  As thousands of drones are being bought by all kinds of people, sooner or later we may face a drone controlled by a moron annoying us. What to do? Here's one solution.

  http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37528390

  Or, you can become a drone hunter, as in this YT video:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgWlm5zrY4w

  Can you see some confrontations ahead?
• 
  16

  Will China's Giant New Radio Telescope be able to hear YHWH and JESUS conversing?

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  china has just switched on its 500 metre diameter radio telescope, nearly twice as large as the previous largest.

  among other things it is tasked to do, it will eventually be programmed to look for and analyse radio waves that may have a non-natural origin.. so will the scientists manning this facility eventually hear yhwh and jesus having a chat?.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvnj-vnsv4o.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  Phizzy : If what is heard is from the distant past, then Yahweh would not have yet been invented by man, and the Nazarene was not yet born, by a long way.

  Good point, Anyway (to keep my silly point going)- some interpret 1 Corinthians 13:1 to mean that there is a different language in heaven, so being 'unbelievers' its unlikely the Chinese will understand 'God speak,' although the leadership of the Christian Taiping rebellion (that nearly conquered China in the mid-nineteenth century) believed that they could (literally) converse with YHWH and Jesus

  ______________________________________________________

  A good assessment of the new Chinese Radio Telescope, including the drive to build it, and the associated difficulties, can be found in the journal, SCIENCE. (published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science).

  The web address for the article is - http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6307/1488

  But you may need a Library's assistance to read it all.

  The summary says:

  The biggest ear

  1. Dennis Normile*

  Science 30 Sep 2016:
  Vol. 353, Issue 6307, pp. 1488-1491
  DOI: 10.1126/science.353.6307.1488

  • China's awesome Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope, the world's largest of its kind, will be able to peer further into the past than previous radio telescopes to gather weaker and more distant signals that promise to provide clues to the origins and evolution of the universe, probe gravitational waves and dark matter, and listen for transmissions from extraterrestrial civilizations. Building the instrument required solving a host of engineering problems, ranging from dealing with a remote, barely accessible site, shielding the dish from radio frequency interference that would drown out the signals from cosmic objects, and developing a first-of-its-kind method to pull a portion of the spherical dish into a gradually moving paraboloid to aim at and track astronomical targets as Earth rotates. Fulfilling the telescope's promised capabilities will mean solving one more engineering challenge in getting that shape-shifting scheme working as planned.
• 
  62

  ls homosexuality really normal?

  by atomant in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  l know animals do it but their animals.they dont live by a moral code.the thought of 2 men going for it is not normal.what are your thoughts?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  atomant : Fulltime student.l was born into the jw sect and my father was an elder but from a very young age l detested being dragged along to meetings against my will.l could see it was a false religion and full of hypocrites.l burnt the bible when l was 9.l never got baptized.Thank god for that,amen.

  
  

  So? Your actions do not suggest that you think rationally. Nor do your arguments on this thread.

  
  

  A few minutes on the internet, would have led you to the knowledge that, according to the UN 51% of Aids infections (globally) affect women. (Note 1).

  And btw, 2.8 million of people with Aids (again globally) are children, who were likely infected while in their mother's womb. (Note 2)

  
  

  Of course, these figures breakdown differently when considering the problem from a regional perspective.

  
  

  And note this overview from amfAR:

  In the United States
  Women account for one in five new HIV diagnoses and deaths caused by AIDS.
  The proportion of AIDS diagnoses reported among women has more than tripled since 1985.
  Approximately one in four people living with HIV infection in the U.S. are women.
  The vast majority of women diagnosed with HIV (86%) contracted the virus through heterosexual sex.
  African Americans constituted 63% of women diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 2013.
  African Americans and Hispanics represent 28% of all women in the U.S. but they account for 80% of HIV cases among women.
  African-American women have an HIV prevalence rate nearly three and a half times that of white women.
  Around the Globe
  Worldwide, women constitute more than half of all people living with HIV.
  For women in their reproductive years (ages 15–49), HIV/AIDS is the leading cause of death.
  Women are at least twice more likely to acquire HIV from men during sexual intercourse than vice versa.
  A study in South Africa found that young women who experienced intimate partner violence were 50% more likely to have acquired HIV than women who had not experienced violence.
  In 2014, 73% of pregnant women living with HIV received effective antiretroviral medicines to prevent the transmission of HIV to their children.
  In sub-Saharan Africa, women constitute 58% of all people living with HIV.
  In 2014, almost 62% of all new HIV infections among adolescents occurred among adolescent girls.
  Sources: UNAIDS Report: How AIDS changed everything, 2015; UNAIDS 2014 Global

  (Note 3)

  Ignorance is no longer an excuse in this time. An old quote from Mark Twain:

  It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. Mark Twain

  
  Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/mouth.html

  Just check, review and question if you want to be taken seriously.

  
  

  
  

  Notes:

  1. http://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/hiv-and-aids/facts-and-figures

  2. http://www.avert.org/global-hiv-and-aids-statistics

  3. http://www.amfar.org/about-hiv-and-aids/facts-and-stats/statistics--women-and-hiv-aids/

  
  

  
  

  
  
• 
  62

  ls homosexuality really normal?

  by atomant in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  l know animals do it but their animals.they dont live by a moral code.the thought of 2 men going for it is not normal.what are your thoughts?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  atomant : Cofty you asked -Unless god-botherers can show that consenting sex between two adult males or two adult females does real harm then they have nothing interesting to add to the conversation. Aids?

  
  

  Are you suggesting atomant, that 'Aids' (i.e. HIV infections ) is a disease that only infects men who have sex with men.?

  If you are making that suggestion, I can see why you became a JW.

  And, in that answer, you have demonstrated that you have given no thought to all the sexually transmitted diseases that afflict humans. Why did this ever-loving, kind hearted divinity that faith driven people like to imagine ever come up with the idea for and then create such horrible diseases?

  Got an answer?
• 
  16

  Will China's Giant New Radio Telescope be able to hear YHWH and JESUS conversing?

  by fulltimestudent in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  china has just switched on its 500 metre diameter radio telescope, nearly twice as large as the previous largest.

  among other things it is tasked to do, it will eventually be programmed to look for and analyse radio waves that may have a non-natural origin.. so will the scientists manning this facility eventually hear yhwh and jesus having a chat?.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvnj-vnsv4o.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  Vidiot: fulltimestudent - "Will China's Giant New Radio Telescope be able to hear YHWH and JESUS conversing?"
  Ten bucks says if it did, they'd try to spin it as Jesus and Yahweh being "pro-communist".

  I'm not sure about that Vidiot, since the only thing 'communist' about the 'Chinese Communist Party' is the use of the word in the name.

  During the first 25 years of the PRC there were two main groupings in the CCP, one thought the best model for modernising China, was the Planned, Centralised economy advocated by Mao. The other group, vilified by Mao, as the 'capitalist roaders,' thought a mixture of state enterprises (the model Japan used to grow industrial might back in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century) and private initiative would get better results. A crisis came during a period when the USA applied sanctions to China and Russia withdrew its aid, Mao tried a sort of 'village initiatives policy' in his 'Great Leap Forward' policy. It had some successes and many failures and as a result the CCP removed Mao from direct control of the economy. That's when, as a response to that, Mao set the 'Cultural Revolution' in process, again with some good results and some terrible results. After Mao's death, Deng Xiaoping, a pragmatic man, allowed private initiative to become the foundation for China's current success.

  Maybe, if the radio telescope picks up some YHWH/Jesus gossip, they'll claim they were saying,"Wow!!! Look at China go."
• 
  21

  "Explaining Your Beliefs About Homosexuality"

  by wizzstick in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  it's doing the rounds but i've not seen it before.. explaining your beliefs about homosexuality.

  there are three pages.

  here are my thoughts on each question on the pages:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  fulltimestudent

  wizzstick: Your sexuality doesn't have a switch you can throw! It's like if God suddenly said that a man should only sleep with a man. What would the heterosexual population do? Could they suddenly create homosexual feelings? No you morons! You can take anger management classes but you can't change your sexual feelings, you can only spend your life trying to ignore them and getting psychologically damaged in the process.

  
  

  Only partly true, I think!

  1. There is a descriptive category called "institutional homosexuality." It describes the situation where large groups of a single sex are located together. Think shipping, particularly in times past. And also prisons. And to a lesser extent single sex boarding schools. For women, think of harems in the past.

  Humans are adaptable, and in these situations humans rise or open (grin) to the situation.

  2. Culture: The Anglosphere seems more restrictive sexually than say Europe. Back in the day, restricted by my JW acculturation, I had to visit France and Germany for business. So I arrived in Essen, had a brief rest and went out to see what Essen was like. I was shocked to go past two male couples engaged in heavy kissing. A few days later I arrived in Paris, took the Metro to the station close to the hotel I was booked into, and again. at the entrance to the station, there was a male couple engaged in kissing each other in a prolonged and fond farewell.

  Since we are all human, I suggest the difference was that they lived in a culture that was less hostile to my own (Aust.) culture.

  I am not arguing that there is no internalised preference, such as is posited for male to male sexuality, and in my studies of say Japanese cultures and their gender behaviour, I've noted periods in Japanese history when M2M sex was extremely common. Professor G. Leupp (Tufts University, USA) in his book "Male Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan," argues that M2M sex was 'normative' at that time. Even if you understood that 'normative' in that era meant that 50% of males could indulge in sex with another male without any qualms, a problem is posed as to why so many of those men could be attracted to another man, as well as to women, and in our contemporary Anglosphere only maybe 7-10% are so attracted.

  A famous Japanese author of the era, Ihara Saikaku, does note that there was a core group, that he identifies as, 'women-haters' that refused sex with women, and they possibly correspond to the 'gay' males of today. Even so, because of our (anglosphere) culture many men who are likely in the exclusively gay (M2M) group, get married and function to an extent as heterosexuals, usually with less than satisfied wives.

  Another era with a similar acceptance to Tokugawa Japan, was Athenian (and other Greek cities) society, in the fourth/fifth centuries BCE. In Plato's 'Symposium', he uses a meeting of the leading men in the city, at a drinking party, together with their boyfriends, discussing the meaning of love. To understand the full irony, you must know of course, that their wives were all at home looking after their kids.

  There are other societies, cultures and time periods when there were similar differences to our own culture.

  So maybe, to be "gay" you must have something that does control your sexual attraction, limiting it to the same sex.

  But aside from that, perhaps its as I've attempted to describe, the mass of heterosexuals may be able to accept a sexual relationship with someone of the same sex if it is culturally driven, and that's why the subject of the other "gay" thread, at the moment is really wrong in what he says about bisexuality.