NewChapter - "If WT didn't put on the front of neutrality, those scary right wingers would grow by millions overnight."
One of the main reasons why I suspect they've lasted over 100 years; similar to the Amish, they're (officially) pacifist; unlike the vast majority of other fundamentalist Christian religions. Most of these actively embrace militancy in one form or another; as a result, if and when they descend into extremist/antisocial behavior, law enforcement - correctly - perceives them as a threat to public safety, and cracks down on them - hard.
NewChapter - "I hope this was all coherent. Did you see Jesus Camp?"
Completely; you seem to get what I'm saying, and no. The trailer creeped me out too much.
Mr.Freeze - "If anything, they will crash and burn, go down with the ship."
That's what I'm trying to get at. They would never percieve it that way (or acknowledge it out loud), but that's irrelevent.
Mr.Freeze - "I don't see that happening anytime soon, despite any recent changes in attitude by the men in the high tower."
Maybe not, but these changes are coming at a rate that's almost dizzying compared to the relative snail's pace of the 20th Century's "New Light", which suggests to me that the WTS (being reactive rather than proactive) is trying all kinds of new tactics to survive, hoping that one or two will stick; they aren't "changes in attitude" - if anything, the attitude has entrenched itself, and the "changes" are an effect rather than a cause.
tia.dalma - "I don't think this religion will self destroy."
I'm not talking about self-destruction, per se; I'm talking about attempting to thin the pack (conciously or otherwise) to save the alphas - and thusly (in their view) - save the Organization. Whether we want to acknowledge it or not, humans (as individuals or groups) are just as influenced by instinct as any other organism on the planet, and in a corner, will do what seems necessary to survive, even if those actions simply postpone extinction, rather than avert it.
In chess, Kings are expected to sacrifice Pawns to protect themselves. Have they not done that on a smaller scale already?
tia.dalma - "...if they survived after predicting that the end will come in 1975, they will survive anything, especialy that they are now very careful not to set any exact date or year."
Ah, but therien lies a substantial problem; recent studies pretty clearly show that apocalyptic millennialist groups absolutely have to date-set in order to foster a minimum sense of urgency among their memberships, and therefore maintain a minimum level of recruitment. With the high turnover rate of the WTS, fostering that urgency would by default be top priority (and we've clearly seen that). Except - after a century of repeated failed predictions, any further date-setting can't help but undermine whatever shred of credibility they have left among the remaining R&F capable of reason.
They need to date-set (among other things) to keep on truckin', but can't anymore.
tia.dalma - "About not having enough donations... they already reduced their costs by publishing the magazines only once a month. If they will change the hours for pioneers, there will be more who pioneer and they will not need to pay so many special pioneers. Many bethel families around the world have been reduced... so I think they know how to handle the money crisis, in case they really have one."
All stopgap measures in the long view; eventually corporations experiencing a prolonged reduction in income flow - despite the value of their assets - run out of cost-cutting contingencies; especially ones that build multi-million dollar complexes to sequester themselves away from the public eye. Their actions - more and more - are characteristic of a bunker mentality; they're battening down the hatches, even if they themselves don't realize it.
tia.dalma - "On the info war... are they really losing it? I don't think so. It looks like they are trying to take advantage of the internet, there is the society's page, the jw.org page where anyone can download literature."
They've been nostalgic for the 50s since the 50s, and as such, the World Wide Web is as alien to them - on a fundamental level - as the Space Age was to people who grew up idolizing the heroes of the Old West. All their reactions to the Information Age have been just that - reactions, and relatively slow responses, at that. Case in point; how many JWs knock on the door and direct people to the WT's website? Plus, the website has no open forum; these days, who frequents websites where they can't participate?
The WT.org website was simply another stopgap measure to give the R&F something with a modicum of modernism; the full transparency and inherent checks and balances of the Information Age, however, are an anthema to any authoritarian regime, even one that presents itself (or even perceives itself) as benign.