full time : it free and yet cost everything, , sadly with the wt being a counterfiet is not really concerned about it follwers and the followers suffer. and in some cases with money.
unstopableravens
JoinedPosts by unstopableravens
-
-
-
-
unstopableravens
cofty: i think he touches on alot of deep things of christ, and yes he uses emotion. dont you think a good pastor should do both. dont confuse truth and grace with manipulation. unless in your mind all christain do that by being christian. he is one of the few, that put truth above tradition. and to me he very easy to listen to. and he is by no means an oil salesman. i think sometimes because there are so many church scammers (creflo dollar, peter popoff etc...) the real ones have that label for no reason. the real manipulative ones will point you to any where but christ. all his seromns point away from man and to christ.
-
-
unstopableravens
cofty:explain why you say he manipulative
-
37
Do You Dine out? If so do you return unsatisfactory food?
by KateWild ini was chatting today in the sauna, as one does if you don't go to meetings about dining out.
one pleasant fellow said he would never return food, he explained it was because he is convinced the staff would do something to the food.. do you agree?.
kate xx.
-
unstopableravens
i dont return food either, i rather eat something that taste bad, then have spit in good food
-
14
Atheist Collection Plate?
by ablebodiedman inhave the atheists been sending around a collection plate to get advertising for their religion?.
.
http://news.ca.msn.com/canada/atheist-billboard-ads-rejected-in-vancouver.
-
unstopableravens
one day every tounge will confess jesus is lord, including all atheist
-
-
unstopableravens
lol now more claims , the new claim is i dont understand what i pasted lol ok
-
-
unstopableravens
bohm: did you listen to whole sermon?
-
-
unstopableravens
ohh well, i did use puncuation. and cofty sorry you and cantleave did not like.
-
-
unstopableravens
so thats a yes? i never said it has less value
-
-
unstopableravens
jgnat: if you had 5 dollars in one pocket and 100 in another and both fell out at the same time, and the wind blow them both away. and you could only recover one. which would it be? well of course the 100 why because it has more value to you. now lets say the same example but in both pockets had 100, now the value is the same, you can only recover one, now which you save is now not determed by value. pro choicers view babys or fetus as that 5 while pro life would see them as 100 or equal in value as the mother. is this a fair comment?