Yippie. Another pseudo philosophy question that doesn't make sense to begin with.
Pass!
Yippie. Another pseudo philosophy question that doesn't make sense to begin with.
Pass!
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
Right. Watchtower is "Metrosexual" as a catch-all phrase to target anyone they want. Even people who take care of their appearance more than others. It's fanning the flames of their homophobia and will begin a culture of witch hunting. You watch! It will. Before, homo hating elders couldn't really do much to a guy or gal they didn't like because they suspected they're LGBT (practicing or not). To go after them without proof of immorality would be grounds for slander. NOW, if you simply walk with a lilt or speak in a whispy voice, these jackasses can pounce.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
Scotsman:
i put those terms in scare quotes to demonstrate the thought process of anyone enforcing this policy. A quick perusal of my other comments on this thread easily show that this letter is ridiculous.
additionally, feel free to browse my other postings over the years & you'll realize that I'm bi. Sometimes, we must demonstrate absurdity by being absurd.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
The term is vague. Metrosexual can simply be a guy who takes care of his appearance & hygiene. It can also include people who look like Bronies (if you don't know what a brony is... Google it lol).
i always identified as metro because I took great care in putting outfits together. I was and still am a big GQ enthusiast. And I always got compliments. Great ties, fantastic knots, silk or linen suits, collar stays, cuff links, modest silver bracelet, nice watch, creed cologne, and aveda skin products. I looked, smelled and felt great. Hell, I even use a cuticle trimmer so my hands don't look busted up. Compare that to the balled up & faded polyester walmart suits most window washing elders wore, I think I represented the bOrg much better! I think it's safe to say that ToMo3 wants everyone to look like him: pear-shaped and frumpy.
so, if they're going to crack down on "metrosexuals," I'd begin with multiple rings! That's something I never did, but the GB really likes that bling.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
in short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
The CO outline also mentions "bearing." So this includes going after people for their posture, the way they stand, sit & walk--all subjectively determined.
i respectfully disagree with Simon's approach on this. This now gives elders official license directly from headquarters to bully. I had an elder at a former hall who loved going after guys & asking them if they were gay. He had a pet peeve. Now that ToMo3 has made his own personal pet peeves a matter of official doctrinal policy, it's open season on everyone. And the fact they're targeting such a volatile & sensitive topic as gender identity in our progressive age of 2015, they're really going to look out of touch. I'm glad they're making a big deal over this, because it's going to make them look crazy. Unfortunately in the meantime, many loyal dubs are going to experience very damaging bullying.
i have been thinking a lot about the lack of support, judgement and criticism of teenagers in the organisation.
i am dealing with the fallout of these policies with my two adolescents...i found this excellent article this morning which is worth a read for anyone interested in this topic - see the links below but first i also wanted to add my own bugbear, forgive the rant: .
a key factor which isn't mentioned in the article is the 'bad association' rule and it's extended application.
based on what we've seen, it seems to me that of the seven, splane and jackson are the smartest; herd, lett and morris the least intelligent; and sanderson and losch somewhere in the middle.
.
what's your impression?.
that was a quote from a dyed in the wool jw recently.
it was a complaint.. we all know that with 'new light(tm)' that the watchtower corporation's version of 'religion' has kept changing for a long time.
since i remember.....and i go back a long way too.
I always feel for the old-timers; some even widows & widowers. Now old with limited fixed income, the main source of spiritual food is online. How are they expected to get modern TVs with HDMI, subscribe to Roku, get a tablet or computer--then learn how to use it? I've seen nothing in any recent articles about special arrangements for them to learn the new tech or even meet & view the monthly broadcasts.
And for any older folks who feel left behind at the latest rebranding, they can't complain. Since 2007/08, there are paragraphs in WT articles subtly hinting at massive changes and how we must accept them even if they don't make sense from a human standpoint. The bOrg has known and been planning all of this for 7 or 8 years now.
hey i was just wondering if you guys had any ideas on how to keep my brain occupied while i'm at an assembly tommorow.
maybe besides tallying the number of times they say jehovah and jesus or counting how many people are wearing red.
i want to keep myself from going insane or having some kind of panic attack lol.
Poor kid probably can't see any of our suggestions at the moment. It's only just now time for mid morning song & announcements ("you may be seated").
Side note: I just woke up half an hour ago. Love my sleep-in Sundays.