i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
My wife has made only one post here so far, and in doing so has never said anything to invite such a lewd message as you've just posted to her, so why is it that you can't simply respect those who have themselves shown nothing but respect?
That's the question, Hannibal.
Yadirf
.
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
Perhaps if you had to shut the heck up like the rest of us motor mouths are required to at times due to the posting limits, you wouldn't have to break the rules and post with 2 accounts in an effort to expel more verbal vomit. Twenty times a day is plenty for that.
I can't "shut the heck up" when you keep demanding attention. If you would FIRST shut the heck up then I wouldn't be replying to you, would I? Does that add up to you?
And, you need to get a life and stop accusing me of breaking the rules. I have broken no rule that I know of. What do you want to have happen, that Simon take away my wife's account? Well, piss hiss on you too if that's the case. She's got as much of a right to have an account here as you or anyone else here does.
XW, of the "needs an invisible, right-handed husband's account so I can post more fluff" class
Go for it, and then shup up about it! I know of no rule against either one.
Yadirf
.
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
You didn't answer my first question Hannibal. Is that the best training that you received from your mother? Surely your display of disrespect towards a woman (my wife) that hasn't shown you any disrespect at all, is not something that your mother would be proud of you for ... would it?
Yadirf
.
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
You are avoiding the question asshole and you are ignoring Simon's warning about using more than one user name. just for the record, I don't think ANYONE who uses multiple user names to post is doing the right thing. That was in case you were going to be childish and bring up examples of others...asshole....
When are you going to be able to get it through your thick skull that I'm NOT "using more than one user name"? I'm not using the name "Lefty" ... I go only by "Yadirf". For me to be "using more than one user name" I'd have to be signing my name as "Lefty". I always sign out as "Yadirf". I do sometimes borrow my wife's account, but that's because with the pack of dogs I generally have chasing and attacking me I can't answer anywhere near the comments directed my way. For that reason, compared to you and others, I actually need a way to increase my posting limits. What you would like, I'm sure, is that you and others could gang up on this JW and, due to my already having run out of posts, not hear what I have to say in return. Yes, I'm sure that you would like to completely squelch this JW, even as Hannibal has just confirmed, but this is a democracy so get used it.
Yadirf
.
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
Hannibal,
My wife has made only one post here so far, and in doing so has never said anything to invite such a lewd message as you've just posted to her, so why is it that you can't simply respect those who have themselves shown nothing but respect? Do you need me to kick your ass?
Yadirf
.
a 2000-year-old-plus religion cannot survive for much longer!
we are questioning the wbts every day!
the web is a great way of exposing the wbts, and we are doing it daily!.
Nice try...
Thats why I have dubbed thee "Slippery Nickery".
Oh, but then you had a little time to do some looking around. And you came up with this:
Now, do I know of any case of people trying to overthrow the Catholic church?"Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC). The head of this group, Frances Kissling, has said it is her goal to overthrow the Catholic Church."
Call 202-863-8000; fax at 202-863-8174; email at [email protected]. to ask them the same question.
Which only goes to prove that you were lying in the first place, by saying at the time that you ALREADY new of such a case, because you only came up with the above after the fact. And you can't deny that.
Even then, what you do offer as proof for your argument is merely a quote without identifying the source from where it came from. You've got to do better than that.
Yadirf
.
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
BTW...did you inform your "wife" you were talking shit and insulting others with her user name?
If you'd of noticed, the name at the bottom of all those posts was "Yadirf," not "Lefty".
And besides, if I had been signing off using her handle would you have tattled on me?
Anything else dumb that you've got to say, Valis Alice?
Yadirf
.
Edited by - Lefty on 24 December 2002 1:49:48
a 2000-year-old-plus religion cannot survive for much longer!
we are questioning the wbts every day!
the web is a great way of exposing the wbts, and we are doing it daily!.
You were the one who said that you knew of a case in which there had been an attempt to overthrow the Catholic church. I'm calling your hand on what you claim to know. Don't ask me to go prove your case for you. You said it, you produce the proof. I don't believe that you can.
This is what I had asked you:
Do you know of any case in which there have been those who have tried to overthrow the Catholic church?
You said "yes" to that question.
Now, putsie up or shutsie up!
Yadirf
.
what really started cheesing me off with the wt and awake magazines while i was still an active jw was the constant propaganda based on man versus jehovah.
it was as if there was a great tug-of-war being propogated between man and god by the wt society.
everything that man made was constantly criticised and belittled, while whatever jehovah made was so great!
For the sake of accuracy I took the liberty of making a couple of minor adjustments to your post:
.....that neither one of them realizes that they have their pants down in full view of the public:*crowd
gaspsapplauds as it catches a glimpse of Yadirfkissingkicking Poops naked a$$ while trousers are down*YEH BABY!!!!
Yadirf
.
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
And a question for Yadirf: Are you saying you have never told a lie on this forum? Be careful how you answer and remember that all your writings are available for review.
Before I answer that, are you saying that in this instance Outlaw hasn't lied?
Yadirf
.
