Lieu

Joined

• started 2 topics
• posted 1,109 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Lieu

• 
  8

  Illuminati?!

  by lv4fer in

  1. social
  2. current

  maybe someone already talked about this, i'm sorry i missed it.

  do you think wt involved?

  what proof?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  Darn! ... and I thought they were the guys from the movie version of "Tomb Raider".
• 
  13

  "seven stars" of Revelation 1:20 - JW...

  by stevieb1 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  .

  according to the march 15, 2002 wt page 14 the "seven stars" of revelation 1:20 in christ's righ hand apply exclusively to appointed jw elders today and since they and the governing body are under christ's direction we should submit to their leadership etc.. .

  at the kingdom hall last week i heard a talk in wich the speaker intimated that since the congregations in asia minor all received letters they were organized in much the same way as the wt is today.. what is your take on this matter?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  The seven stars (are not really angels) and are not really seven in number literally but are all elders (messengers) in the seven congregations.

  Okay, I can't recall any message from God being transmitted by man first to other men. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the ANGELS always give the direct message to chosen men so that there would be no confusion and claims of stupidity?

  Also, if the stated "messengers" are elders, then we don't need angels.

  It seems to me that the Angels aren't talking to the GB or anybody else associated with the WBTS...unlike ALL the faithful of old who were directly communicated with on a regular basis. I see no angelic diretion in the WBTS...only man-made direction....the blind leading the blind.

  The GB claims to have recieved NO messages, no inspiration, nor any direction directly from the angles. None would claim to have heard, seen, or have been visited by an angel...so whose "message" are they giving?
• 
  13

  "seven stars" of Revelation 1:20 - JW...

  by stevieb1 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  .

  according to the march 15, 2002 wt page 14 the "seven stars" of revelation 1:20 in christ's righ hand apply exclusively to appointed jw elders today and since they and the governing body are under christ's direction we should submit to their leadership etc.. .

  at the kingdom hall last week i heard a talk in wich the speaker intimated that since the congregations in asia minor all received letters they were organized in much the same way as the wt is today.. what is your take on this matter?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  Personally, I believe that if Christ and his angels are running the Congregations...well, there's basically no need for elders or any imperfect human screw-ups. The only useful purpose I see, for "the friends", is that of encouragement and fellowship.

  I have noticed the increasing attempts of the Org. to make elders into demi-gods. Unbelievable!
• 
  13

  "seven stars" of Revelation 1:20 - JW...

  by stevieb1 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  .

  according to the march 15, 2002 wt page 14 the "seven stars" of revelation 1:20 in christ's righ hand apply exclusively to appointed jw elders today and since they and the governing body are under christ's direction we should submit to their leadership etc.. .

  at the kingdom hall last week i heard a talk in wich the speaker intimated that since the congregations in asia minor all received letters they were organized in much the same way as the wt is today.. what is your take on this matter?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  For some strange reason when the angel says "the seven stars MEAN"....I kinda go along with what the angel says and not anyone else.

  Its okay, thought, I hear the elders are also the "glorious ones", etc., ad nausem....Yeah right.

  See we're all the same, no need for special titles, or to make some seem worth MORE than others....Yeah right.

  Edited by - Lieu on 25 June 2002 15:34:57
• 
  68

  why i do believe in 607

  by perspicacia2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  the bible reports that the babylonians under nebuchadnezzar destroyed .

  chronology, the desolation of jerusalem would have been in the year 587/6 .

  babylon (in his accession year, 605 b.c.e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  I say that no one really knows what YEAR these things happened. The Bible has no dates...it only states in the second year of such-and-such, and the like. It gives no dates because the dates aren't important. Why, as we can all attest, because some crackpots would spend an entire lifetime trying to figure out when the big A was supposed to happen....a date, time, and year that is NONE of anyone's stinking business!

  Mankind has had various dating systems through the stream of time...all which have changed dramatically. This is why I ask how do we really know what year it is?

  WHICH calender (dating system) should we use and does it include leap-years? Are we supposed to factor leap-years into the 70 yr period? Yes? No?

  Note on dates: Virtually all precise dates for early Rome are antiquarian reconstructions. The conventional (Varronian) dates for Roman events before the late 4th century are high by four years due to the insertion of the fabricated dictator-years333, 324, 309, and 301. In what follows, the conventional dates will appear in square brackets.]

  Late in the fourth century the modern calender system was "made up". Yeah, this all makes since considering we're presumptuous enough to count time based on when everyone "suppposes" Christ was born. Sure, okay.
• 
  59

  Homework: what do nations think about america?

  by raven101 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  .

  i would appreciate any input from residents of other nations for this homework assignment, as well as americans.. what do members of other nations really think about america, compared with what we percieve them as thinking?.

  please help, assignment due tomorrow!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  Having lived on several continents, this is what I have noticed:

  Americans when visiting other places tend to bring certain 'baggage' ... certian attitudes.

  Americans tend to think they are the only people in the world and everyone else should be glad they (Americans) exist.

  Americans tend to wonder, when they finally travel outside the USA, why people don't have what they have. Unbelievably naiive.

  Americans tend to think the laws of other countries are just like this one and are usually suprised when the Germans take their drivers license for six months due to speeding. Or that the penalty for DWI in Mexico is death.

  Americans basically have absolutely no idea what goes on in the rest of the world. We usually also have no idea what US policies are toward the rest of the world...leaving us to wonder again why such and such country hates us....Hmmmm?

  Americans living in foreign countries tend to treat the citizens as if beneath themselves. Americans bring their hatreds and biases with them, whever they go.

  Americans don't realize that everyone else in the world wants the same thing they do...Freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But they don't necessarily want it in the American style.
• 
  10

  Heavenly Hope

  by cyrano in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the watchtower teaches only a few have the heavenly hope.

  men of old such as abraham will supposedly be raised from the dead and live on earth.

  yet, hebrews tells us these men actually had a heavenly hope.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  That was THE best book ever written by the WBTS. (In ref: The Greatest Man Who Ever Lived)

  It was the only one that when I finished reading...that just plain made me happy!
• 
  68

  why i do believe in 607

  by perspicacia2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  the bible reports that the babylonians under nebuchadnezzar destroyed .

  chronology, the desolation of jerusalem would have been in the year 587/6 .

  babylon (in his accession year, 605 b.c.e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  perspicacia2 is counting the time incorrectly....... If you add 70 years to 537, you don't get 607. Why? Because time counts DOWN not UP. The correct thing to do would be to SUBTRACT 70 years. Time (as counted by Western standards) goes 606, 537, 482, 1 BC...AFTER the birth of Christ, 1 AD, 537, 607, etc. The years before Christs birth are counting down to zero. (by Western standards, and whos to say Western standards are correct)

  Fact is, no specific years are mentioned in the Bible because YEARS aren't important. Counting time as specific years is something that man has recently made up ...but it isn't God's way. The Bible tells us to pay attention to the signs, times, and seasons...not to any specific year date.

  I for one am sick and tired of MAN trying to guess when God's day is supposed to happen. It isn't for anyone to know; therefor anyone who claims to know when it is, is an outright liar and a blasphemer. Stop being like Adam and Eve, stealing and eating something that doesn't belong to you....Can't God just have his one tree? ... His one secret day?

  Like God has to do things when WE say so. Unbelievable!

  The Gentile times haven't ended yet...their kings (rulers) are STILL having their day!!!! Next thing you know, somebody will be saying they know what year Adam was created. NOT!!!

  Truth is, we don't even know what year this truly is from the beginning of man's creation. Is it really 2002? How do we know? We don't know. ( We made it up!! ) The reason we don't know is because its not important. I hope your entire faith isn't based on a Year date. If so, your faith is in vain.

  Edited by - Lieu on 19 June 2002 3:43:57

  Edited by - Lieu on 19 June 2002 3:46:1
• 
  11

  JW's (again) dodge the question.....

  by TheApostleAK in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  q is the organization a direct channel between god and humanity?

  a again, our governing body has never claimed that our organization is inspired or infallible.

  instead they, our governing body, study the bible diligently and through prayer they make a request for his holy spirit to direct them and be upon them.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  Here's something updated for the person who asked about 'channels': ....(Southland)

  *** w99 12/1 15-16 Be Happy Readers of the Book of Revelation *** Who is the ultimate Source of the Revelation, and what channel is used to transmit it? The opening verse tells us: "A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented it in signs through him to his slave John." (Revelation 1:1) To put it simply, the actual Source of the Revelation is Jehovah God, who gave it to Jesus, and by means of an angel, Jesus communicated it to John. A little further scrutiny reveals that Jesus also used the holy spirit to convey messages to the congregations and to give John visions.Revelation 2:7, 11, 17, 29; 3:6, 13, 22; 4:2; 17:3; 21:10; compare Acts 2:33.

  4

  Jehovah still uses his Son, the "head of the congregation," to teach his servants on earth. (Ephesians 5:23; Isaiah 54:13; John 6:45) Jehovah also uses his spirit to instruct his people. (John 15:26; 1 Corinthians 2:10) And just as Jesus used "his slave John" to communicate sustaining spiritual food to the first-century congregations, so today he uses "the faithful and discreet slave," made up of his anointed "brothers" on earth, to give his domestics and their companions spiritual "food at the proper time." (Matthew 24:45-47; 25:40) Happy are those who recognize the Source of the good gifts we receive in the way of spiritual food and the channel He is using.James 1:17.

  Christ-Directed

  Congregations

  5

  In the opening chapters of Revelation, Christian congregations are likened to lampstands. Their overseers are likened to angels (messengers) and to stars. (Revelation 1:20) Speaking of himself, Christ told John to write: "These are the things that he says who holds the seven stars in his right hand, he who walks in the midst of the seven golden lampstands." (Revelation 2:1) The seven messages sent to the seven Asian congregations show that in the first century C.E., the congregations and their elders had their strong points and their weak points. The same is true today. We will, therefore, be much happier if we never lose sight of the fact that Christ, our Head, is in the midst of the congregations. He knows exactly what is going on. The overseers are symbolically "in his right hand," that is, under his control and direction and answerable to him for the way they shepherd the congregations.Acts 20:28; Hebrews 13:17.

  Confused, eh?

  Edited by - Lieu on 11 June 2002 18:10:50
• 
  13

  Anybody see the July 1 2002 WT?

  by Lieu in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  if anyone has read the study articles...exactly what did you think?

  my take on the matter: all of the "great crowd of other sheep" are now being equated to the 'foreigners' of isaiah's prophesy.the 'gb' now thinks they are actually zion instead of being sons of zion which explains their thinking they are the "mother" and not the sons.but they are also the sons of zion....or earthly sons...but also zion...but wtf?if the gb are = to zion which is = to jah's woman, then they actually think they are = to jah...and are not the bride of christ (son) but have the audacity to think they could be the bride of jah (father).a reiteration of the 1919 stupid thing runs rampant throughout the article....can't we just stop with the dates fellas?!!

  !they think they (gb) have been repurchased by jah .... not by christ and his blood who is supposed to be thier husbandly ownerthey try and rationalise why the congregational election of elders stopped...instead of telling the truth of why it stopped.. i have come to the conclusion that the gb does not acknowledge anything christ did, nor the fact that the 'annointed' are suposed to make up the 'bride of christ'.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lieu

  If anyone has read the study articles...exactly what did you think? My take on the matter:

  • All of the "great crowd of other sheep" are now being equated to the 'foreigners' of Isaiah's prophesy.
  • The 'GB' now thinks they are actually Zion instead of being sons of Zion which explains their thinking they are the "Mother" and not the sons.
  • But they are also the sons of Zion....or earthly sons...but also Zion...but WTF?
  • If the GB are = to Zion which is = to Jah's woman, then they actually think they are = to Jah...and are not the bride of Christ (son) but have the audacity to think they could be the bride of Jah (father).
  • A reiteration of the 1919 stupid thing runs rampant throughout the article....can't we just STOP with the dates fellas?!!!
  • They think they (GB) have been repurchased by Jah .... not by Christ and his blood who is SUPPOSED to be thier husbandly owner
  • They try and rationalise why the congregational election of Elders stopped...instead of telling the truth of why it stopped.

  I have come to the conclusion that the GB does not acknowledge anything Christ did, nor the fact that the 'annointed' are suposed to make up the 'bride of Christ'. In my opinion this article says that Christ died for nothing...by stating He is NOT the repurchaser. They are not heirs or 'sons' they ARE the Mother, therefore they are OVER Christ since he is just the Son.

  It amazes me that even today, JW's follow the lead of a cigar, smoking money mongering, drunkard. The GB is Disgusting! They have denied Christ and in doing so, they have denied Jehovah.

  Did anyone see the article?

  Edited by - Lieu on 10 June 2002 8:51:56