I just thought of something too. How exactly is slaying someone "mentally diseased" considered a victory?
Braveheart wouldn't look so brave slaying 10,000 people confined to wheel-chairs.
before the mentally diseased apostates could get their hands on and dissect any information regarding the convention that hadn't been released to regular publishers/elders...the society released the district program on the official site completely and utterly slaying every single demented apostate on the face of the earth.
now have fun dissecting it kiddos, while we big kids get a taste of solid, spiritual meet this summer.
continue drowning in misery while god's people go on rejoicing and enduring these last days.
I just thought of something too. How exactly is slaying someone "mentally diseased" considered a victory?
Braveheart wouldn't look so brave slaying 10,000 people confined to wheel-chairs.
before the mentally diseased apostates could get their hands on and dissect any information regarding the convention that hadn't been released to regular publishers/elders...the society released the district program on the official site completely and utterly slaying every single demented apostate on the face of the earth.
now have fun dissecting it kiddos, while we big kids get a taste of solid, spiritual meet this summer.
continue drowning in misery while god's people go on rejoicing and enduring these last days.
LOL, I think we have a troll.
the society released the district program on the official site completely and utterly slaying every single demented apostate on the face of the earth
That's nothing. I once slayed 2 million Bloons in Bloons Tower Defence 5. In case you are thinking, "that is a piece of cake", these were no ordinary Bloons. These were mentally diseased/demented Bloons. These Bloons meant business.
I think I just +1 your GB. Your move, little lady.
i have an issue with preaching.
specifically, going door to door, talking to people who, for the most part, have no desire whatsoever to hear what i have to say.
more specifically, being required to do so as a means of salvation.
Eze 3:17-21 - warning someone wicked
Does that mean going D2D? Context my friend. Does that mean shoving literature down people's throats and getting them to go to meetings, and in general submitting to the JW way of life?
Rom 10:14,15 - how, in turn will they hear without someone to preach?
Preaching, but in what capacity? What method? Exactly.
1 Tim 4:16 - Pay constant attention to yourself and to your teaching. Stay by these things, for by doing this you will save both yourself and those who listen to you.
Who is Paul writing to, specifically?
Luke 19:40 - I tell YOU, If these remained silent, the stones would cry out.
I'll add context.
37 When he came near the place where the road goes down the Mount of Olives, the whole crowd of disciples began joyfully to praise God in loud voices for all the miracles they had seen:
38 “Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord!” [b]
“Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!”
39 Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to Jesus, “Teacher, rebuke your disciples!”
These disciples are supposed to have seen MIRACLES. Why would you have any reason to keep quiet?
2 Tim 4:2 - preach the word, be at it urgently in favorable season, in troublesome season, reprove, reprimand, exhort, with all long-suffering and [art of] teaching
Timothy was a "superintendent" or an "elder", whatever you want to call it. He had been on missions with Paul before. It was directed at him, and by extension anyone with a position of responsibility.
Interesting how WT takes so many verses out of context.
what is it about higher criticism that petrifies the watchtower?
what are they trying to hide?.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/higher%20criticism.
Doug, that's certainly an interesting avenue you are going through. Me thinks, for example, that a study of comparative religions is very useful as a supplement, such as the thread Bethel - the house of the canaanite god El.
That certainly adds context to what most Biblical Literalists deem the "untouchable, uninfluentiable Word of God."
is there a church-of-england.net, or a baptist.net, etc, or are we the only ones that peeved by our religion?.
would be interesting to see how other religions compare as they are after all, all buildings of man, except of course, judaism, though even thats fallen down..
Ex-Mormons are peeved. Christians in general are peeved. You don't need a specific .net to see that.
the latin fathers of the church has never described jesus carrying a "patibulum".
indeed, the early christians to represent jesus carrying the "crux", not the "patibulum".
it's a fact.
Both the cross and stake are old pagan symbols. The phallus was a major pagan symbol. Does it matter if Jesus was crucified on a giant phallus?
What exactly is the point of arguing this?
Say it's a stake. What then? What exactly happens next?
i sometimes wonder how things would have been if adam and eve had procreated before eating from the tree of knowledge, and the ramifications of such.. if any children didnt also eat of the tree, would we now have two groups of humans on earth, one perfect and living forever, and us.. would god have split the two classes of human, putting eden on another planet or dimension or such?.
does this indicate that its all deliberate, that god knew satans plan so let the play unfold before letting adam and eve know each other?.
or does it just mean that satan was allready corrupted and wanted to get his deed done at the very beggining to ensuer he had everyone?.
OGD, how do you reconcile the message of salvation preached by Jesus, the fall from perfection of Adam and Eve, and the coming of sin and death into the world?
Can the bible "work" as you propose?
there is no shortage of ex-elders, behelites, ex-circuit overseers on this forum that continue to spout their hatred for christians, even as they did while leading their former adherents down the same path.
the new religion for these preachers of paradise, is materialism.
in their view, science is the arbitrator of truth.
Nambo, what do you think about the Bible in regards to being inspired and the Word of God?
what is it about higher criticism that petrifies the watchtower?
what are they trying to hide?.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/higher%20criticism.
From the link Doug gave:
The principles of higher criticism are based on reason rather than revelation and are also speculative by nature.
Reason
Speculation
If you are simply left with a maybe, a what if, no matter how iron-clad the argument looks, you simply can't be 100%.
Then again, that seems like a preferable option to the leap of faith required to believe the Bible as inspired by God.
i sometimes wonder how things would have been if adam and eve had procreated before eating from the tree of knowledge, and the ramifications of such.. if any children didnt also eat of the tree, would we now have two groups of humans on earth, one perfect and living forever, and us.. would god have split the two classes of human, putting eden on another planet or dimension or such?.
does this indicate that its all deliberate, that god knew satans plan so let the play unfold before letting adam and eve know each other?.
or does it just mean that satan was allready corrupted and wanted to get his deed done at the very beggining to ensuer he had everyone?.
You make a good point, Black Sheep. To begin, if I had a smoking-hot woman materialize out of nowhere, and it was declared she was my spouse, I wouldn't exactly spend my time naming the animals. I would get down to business!