I guess my question back is: is it really true that a good creator could only have created life (and the universe, really) without using a process as brutal as evolution? - Sulla
Well, if you are talking about an omnipotent creator as well, then you are limiting his power. Also, how does such brutality fit into the description "good"? Why would you worship or reverence such an entity?
I think this leads to an even worse conclusion than what atheism provides. To say there is someone behind the suffering of creation, and that same entity is god, just gives us a cruel creator. How exactly is that "spiritually satisfying"?
That the whole process of placing life in every possible place on the planet could only be justly implemented by herbivorous creature who gently pass from this life painlessly and in their sleep? - Sulla
Why even have them pass? What exactly forbids their eternity? Also, why not?
Maybe it is better to start at a different point. Seeing all this suffering, couldn't one conclude that God is very much like Ares, who actually likes suffering and pain? It seems to me that the answer is yes. - Sulla
How exactly does that fit the Christian paradigm again? I have heard it argued that god needed to create or allow evil in order to be complete, in order to be able to show justice, mercy, and other such qualities. Even with this argument there are problems, namely, a perfect god cannot be perfect and incomplete at the same time.
BTW cofty, thanks for this thread. Interesting, and good dialogue going on. I was particularly interested in Sulla's and BTS's arguments, and while I still find them lacking and unconvincing, I appreciate them none the less.