The OT stories are important and special because they are a) extraordinarily good and b) because they are Jewish. -Sulla
a.) In what sense are they extraordinarily good? Surely you've read the awful parts as well?
b.) The OT stories are good because they are Jewish, and God is a Jew.... I'm not quite sure I follow.
The quality of the stories is grasped through the larger themes. Foe example: The Jewish creation myth has man being formed from God's own breath and in his own image. This is interesting because so many other stories insist that men are made from dragon blood or something. Those other stories also seem true in some way, but the Jewish approach leads us to a different place, doesn't it? - Sulla
At the end of the day, the myth is one and the same. I'm trying real hard to understand how you reconcile the myth with the reality.
The, of course, you have this preposterous claim that the eschatological figure winds up getting murdered and raised, and that this fixes everything. That's where it gets interesting.
Oh, indeed, very interesting.
My question though is, what exactly from the Bible do you consider to be concrete truth, concrete reality? I don't know what better way to ask. I can understand seeking "spirituality", "meaning in existence", connecting in some seemingly profound way with the past, etc.
What I don't understand is religion claiming to possess truth, and then having you claim that as a Catholic, you alone are reading the Bible the "right way".
In the words of Pontius Pilate, "What is truth"?