Metatron ---
You are absolutely correct, anyone can make an accusation. I too am well aware of that and like to make the same allowances as you mention.
The trouble with this situation is that there have been so many dispicable things happening lately that absolutely nothing would surprise me about them any more. Sometimes it's best to be prepared for the unthinkable. One can do that and yet still not "convict" them in that sense.
Instead, my inclination is to examine everything with a cold, hard examination and refuse to take anything they have to say without verification. They deserve no trust whatsoever. This includes even those (at the top) who are probably innocent, for most of them have deliberately closed their eyes to the wrongdoing of others for the sake of peace, and/or in an attempt to save their own hides. Then again there are those who are not strong enough to face the hard truth that their "shepherds" are really wolves in sheep's clothing.
All three of these alternatives are matters that contraindicate any trust in them, individually or collectively. I can see and feel strongly in the latter two circumstances that forgiveness and consideration can be called for, for who of us are without guilt in these departments in one way or another? But trust is another matter. First they would have to prove that they have faced the truth squarely and not allowed the fear of man to affect their decisions.
I view this whole situation as being much like the time the Nation of Israel was supposed to go into the Promised Land. They sent out the 12 spies and only two of them came back with a favorable report. The whole nation chickened out, and the punishment was that ALL males 30 and over (except Joshua and Caleb) were condemned to die in the Wilderness. Why, in view of the fact that the decision was made by the leaders of the nation? It's because they all, right down to the lowliest shephard, had the responsibility to speak up. Due to the fear of man, they didn't.
The same principle holds true here. They loved the glamour and prestige of being of an elite class, but shirked the responsibility that goes with it.
I think that you are right, I do need to read C of C. I was of the impression that much of Ray's situation occurred before Jaracz's tenure. Apparently I'm wrong.
But you are too in one sense. One doesn't need to belong to a body of elders to be very familiar with the tactics of assertive men. I turned down a position during the original meetings set up to establish the elder arrangement as they wanted to bend a few rules in order to get it. After that there was an unending series of elders who wanted me to "reach out", but first I had to acknowledge the "pecking order". None were ever able to establish it, for every time they tried, I ended up on top.
Thanks for your comments. I appreciated them.
LoneWolf