todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
I guess you didn't check the etymology or the original meanings/synonyms, etc, for the word?
Not sure how you can dismiss something without actually looking at it - because it is all there; its not hidden - but to each his own.
You ARE guessing and ARE wrong, so..... no change from the usual, I see.
todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
You really ought to check your sources better, EP... your source for the whole abyssing thing has lied to you (or simply seen/heard what they WANTED to see/hear)
Says the person that claims the word dragon can totally mean a celestial man. Really, if you are going to keep up with the BS, you need better quality BS.
Dismissed.
http://climate.nasa.gov/news/864?goback=.gmp_4132340.gde_4132340_member_214671553.
yup, nasa.
talking about cold fusion.
Name-calling, ad hominem remarks
You mean like calling people zealots, superficial and full of negativity and hate like you did?
todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
Well, people DO more often tend to hear what they WANT to hear... versus what is true... so I can see how that would be.
If only there was someone on the forum who was a perfect example of hearing things.....
todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
why didn't god put his name in DNA? Or teach people about it? Or create a system where such suffering is not possible?
Because he is a myth.
Ummmm... your declination wasn't really warranted, dear jgnat (peace to you!), as I didn't actually offer you anything. It's not really within my power to do so, really. I mean, some have that gift - I don't think I do.
Says the person that claims they can abyss me to Satan and routinely claims others are children of the devil.
todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
Which is what those who define the word modernly do.
Making up new mythical creatures and calling it the same word is not the same thing at all.
It is a scientific approach
Sorry, you said no one said it was, now you are saying it. You are contradicting yourself.
Just pointing out that the modern depiction of dragon is just that... a modern idea/depiction
then why were you reaching into the past to support a modern ridiculous idea?
The word dragon throws people off because of its modern meaning.
No, it doesn't because it never meant what some people are trying to claim it means now. Why do you fall for such ridiculous ideas?
todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
Yep, Tec, and none of those are what the claim was. Why do you continually defend such ridiculous positions?
...and that applies to religion as well as politics.. if someone simply believes such and such is true, it doesn't really matter whether you "prove" it or not.
people will believe what they want to believe..
ATWO's posts usually are excellent.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/457671#i1,p0,d1.
it's a slightly less violent version of passion of the christ.
djesus unchained.. .
I just thought Chrisoph Waltz was awesome in everything I have ever seen him in.
Tec, agreed. That discussion does deteriote, mainly due to the lack or fact and accusations that people were following the wrong thing with the accusers claiming to have the REAL knowledge that is just as useless as the old information. C'est la vie.
todays scientists can and do insert their trademark into dna.. why couldn't jehovah anticipate scientists learning this technique and stumbling across a strand that says "human by yhwh"?.
that would have answered a lot of questions.. he could have even included a model number human2.0.
Ummmm... who said it was "supposed" to be a "scientific" approach? No one but you. YOU tried to use it AS a "scientific" approach, then to denounce that "approach." But it was never meant AS a scientific approach, although it IS a scientifica approach. It was merely meant as a means to foment a stronger flock of sheep. Which is did. Which can be... and is... done scientifically, yes. But that wasn't the intent of the Jacob's actions, as YOU wish to assert here.
No one said it's a scientific approach but it is a scientific approach? FFS, what a jello approach to saying something.
