i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
So if you posted who cares, I would know there is still intelligent life on Earth. And we would have something in common.
Exactly. Despite your weird babble, we still have that that there is intelligent life. You'll make it in the club one day. Chin up, little tropper!
And work on that hate. That's a deal breaker for Jesus.
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
How do you not understand that it was some else apologizing ? If I "babble" you are in BIG trouble.
Because it was long and an bunch of babble. Babble babble babble. I'm in trouble? What are you gonna do, babble at me some more?
How old are you? H-o-w o-l-d a-r-e y-o-u? Is that clear EntirelyPossible?
Not really. You're still kind of babble babble babbling.
It is looking like the world is for understanding nothing more than stupid.
Not really, we still don't understand you.
So if I babble it is because I hate you.
I guess if Jesus exists you WILL get your wish of eternal destuction. There is no place for hate of fellow man in his healing light.
the sokal affair.
the paper, transgressing the boundaries: towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity, was published in science wars in 1996. on the day of publication, sokal announced (in a different paper,) that the article was a hoax.
he said that social text was a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense.
Totally have a sense of humor. Piltdown Perry is HILARIOUS. Unfortunately, willful ignorance and hypocrisy are no laughing matter, PP.
i just thought i'd share something if you don't mind.. my conviction in the legitimacy of the society was slowy eroded over a number of years simply by reading the publications and becoming increasingly frustrated at how little the interpretations of prophecy and scripture made sense, added to the complete ineptitude of senior figures in the organisation.. for me, the "glue" that kept everything roughly held together into something that can be called a "faith" was the concept of "increasing light", which as you all know is the principle employed by the society to excuse any mistakes or backtracks that are made.
they routinely flog proverbs 4:18, which as we all know has nothing to do with gradual refinements in understanding when read in context.
regardless of this, the concept managed to keep me loyal to the organisation for quite some time, as i was too fearful to bring it under direct scrutiny.
Am I babbling again?
"Again" implies that you stopped at some point.
there,s a civil war in that country.
why don,t the.
un get involve.
Brazil?
the sokal affair.
the paper, transgressing the boundaries: towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity, was published in science wars in 1996. on the day of publication, sokal announced (in a different paper,) that the article was a hoax.
he said that social text was a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense.
I have new name for this yahoo... Piltdown Perry. Will you all join me in applying this new name to this willfully ignorant pseudoscience proprietor & hypocrit?
i'm sure we have been visited by the third kind, but i am referring to a time, within our lives, where as a whole man will be visited and see them.
i know mother shipton, maya, sumerian, and others all reference a future (in all aspects similar to our modern time) when the "gods" will return and help men ascend to a new level.
personally, i don't think such an event is too far fetched..
I'd love to see you in some ruby red slippers and pigtails, baby...
i bought a book for my daughter called 'the daring book for girls'.
it's really cool and has lots of fun stuff in it but there's a section on slumber parties where they describe a few games.
this has opened up some questions for me.... the first game described is 'bloody mary'.
And it is a damn shame! Because the spirit world is entirely real and they love it when you bob along like you have not a thing to worry about!
Can you prove any of that? Not only that they are real but that you know what they love? How do you know that they only love that because I am not bothering them all the time? Maybe they DO love me for not beleiving in them so they can live their life in peace, that they aren't bothering you in an effort to not so subtley tell you to leave them alone, like shooing a fly away?
And, since they AREN'T bothering me (presuming they are real), how is that any different than them not existing?
the sokal affair.
the paper, transgressing the boundaries: towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity, was published in science wars in 1996. on the day of publication, sokal announced (in a different paper,) that the article was a hoax.
he said that social text was a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense.
Perry...what an ill informed, willfully ignorant hypocritical maroon...
i bought a book for my daughter called 'the daring book for girls'.
it's really cool and has lots of fun stuff in it but there's a section on slumber parties where they describe a few games.
this has opened up some questions for me.... the first game described is 'bloody mary'.
I know most of you don't believe in the Devil and that's a damn shame. I believe without a shadow of a doubt that he exists. Now go ahead and call me crazy......
How do you know it's a he? Why is it a shame? If he exists, he's sure never done anything to me.
You're crazy...
