If this is a scam, SIZEMIK you owe me one hell of an apology, as well as to all the others you insulted and abused along the way. You stated that you personally confirmed it was authentic, so your personal reputation is now on the line too. . . . shepherd
My personal reputation on JWN is oh so dear to me . . . so I'll answer you.
Stevens suit was authentic, along with his actual bona-fide existence. Those who bothered to find out for themselves already know this . . . if you continue to doubt that I honestly don't care. My comment was facetious and obviously too subtle for you.
Like Mr Monroe commented earlier, I don't agree with Stevens approach on a number of levels, but I don't expect the world to live according to my personal prescription. The initial use of the illustration in question was ill-advised and an error of judgement in my opinion. I'm also cognizant of Stevens personal connection, history and circumstances to some degree, and therefore am also aware why he could make such an error.
If this is a scam, SIZEMIK
Why "IF" . . . why don't you find out for yourself? That's been my beef with you all along . . . you admit your ignorance and then do nothing about it except post your uninformed negative opinions and expect everybody else to do your research for you . . . and then grizzle when they don't.
No scam . . . no apology. If anyone else has a beef with me they don't need you as their champion . . . or to form a delegation for your personal comfort.
Obviously this has upset you enough to stick in your craw for this long . . . maybe you could look inwardly for a change as I first prompted you to do and be honest with yourself . . . self-justification will only relieve your CD for so long.