Precisely. He really does not emphasize process. But as a naturalist and a Botanist, he well knows that any science needs the riggor of proof and an established repeatable process for verification. That is his main intent (even though I feel he does not succeed) in explaining the "delusion" of god by some means, either the moth suicidal instinct, memes or whatever. . . . Etude
Thank you for conceeding that . . . but now you've widened the issue . . . it doesn't change the fact that the quote you used did not mean what you claimed. He not only doesn't emphasis process . . . he simply doesn't mention it at all. You can still make your point without language manipulation . . . the very thing you highlighted.