after reading about tight pant tony's rant about sisters only marrying ministerial servants lest their marriage will be a failure what anecdotal evidence do you have to support this.
the divorces that i am familiar with in the congregation show me that having priveledges in the congregation do not improve the odds of a better marriage.
i would say about 60% of the divorces had at least one spouse who was a pioneer, elder or ministerial servant.
What he was really saying is that ANY MALE who isn't at least a ministerial servant is a piece of crap.
So if you are 35 and you don't have any "position" even if you are married and have children of your own you are worthless because you haven't reached out.
Sounds like the head saying to the feet I have no use for you.
the big news at the annual corporate meeting was probably the sudden realization that gog of .
magog was some group of nations.
the news was given by geoffrey jackson.
The big news at the annual corporate meeting was probably the sudden realization that Gog of
Magog was some group of nations. The news was given by Geoffrey Jackson. As is usually the
case with NEW LIGHT they start out discussing the OLD LIGHT. In this case the Watchtower
has left a consistent trail interpreting Gog of Magog as representing the Devil. The question with
all these adjusted explanations is why Jehovah would allow his people to be misled in the first
place. Since the Bible never says Gog of Magog is the Devil what’s the advantage of making or
allowing these “servers of spiritual food”to believe that?
We can be pretty sure that no angels are delivering these new insights to the Watchtower’s
writers. Something significant had to happen that made them change their view. We saw the
same thing with the discovery of the Great Crowd when it became obvious that the number of
JW’s got too large. The same thing happened with the 1914 generation explanation. In 1994 it
was obvious that those old enough to understand world events were part of an almost extinct
group. So what happened to bring up this new understanding of Gog of Magog?
What is obvious on the world’s stage? It is the return of the hostilities between Russia and the
United States. The old King of the North vs. King of the South scenario. Jackson kept referring
to the similarities between Gog of Magog and the King of the North. Finally he dramatically
raised the question “So who is the King of the North?” The audience reacted to this question
with an anticipatory audible buzz. Just the reaction Jackson was hoping for. He followed this up
by saying “We can’t be sure - yet.” And then he raised expectations that when they get it figured
out they will make it known. Or maybe they are waiting for brother Freddy Franz to speak to
them across the curtain in the most holy and reveal who the King of the North and Gog of Magog
really is.
They will probably defend their confusion over the King of the North because it cleared the way
for hundreds of thousands of new JW’s in Russia and its former republics. If they maintained the
stance that the King of the North was Russia they would have risked the work coming under a
ban. How could they be allowed to freely carry on their work and talk about Russia being the
evil King of the North? To be sure they don’t want to be too quick to send out the message that
Putin’s Russia is the King of the North that goes forth in a great rage to “annihilate and devote
many to destruction.”
at the corporate meeting david splane discusses the use and misuse of types/antitypes.. the main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented in the scriptures as a. type of some future event.. he quoted schroeder who said if an account isnt explained in the scriptures as a type than you.
shouldnt use the event as a type.. splane summed up his talk by saying if the bible is silent - we must be silent.. but they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly.
going beyond anything written in the bible about nebuchadnezzars tree dream.. the bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing nebuchadnezzar.. daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.. .
Ding,
Splane discussed pyramidology in his talk. He treated it like a cute and quaint sidetrack.
Ho ho ho. Yes that was a crazy obsession of a few and it was long ago. Ha Ha Ha.
at the corporate meeting david splane discusses the use and misuse of types/antitypes.. the main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented in the scriptures as a. type of some future event.. he quoted schroeder who said if an account isnt explained in the scriptures as a type than you.
shouldnt use the event as a type.. splane summed up his talk by saying if the bible is silent - we must be silent.. but they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly.
going beyond anything written in the bible about nebuchadnezzars tree dream.. the bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing nebuchadnezzar.. daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.. .
I need to clarify something here. I posted the title as referring to Splane. But we don't know if he was the sole originator of this concept.
He is an easy target because he gave the talk. Most likely this was voted on by the GB. We will never know who thought it was a good time to bring up typology.
They have been going through a lot of crazy ideas ever since the Oracle (Fred Franz) died. Not that his stuff wasn't crazy. But it had a certain consistency to the madness.
at the corporate meeting david splane discusses the use and misuse of types/antitypes.. the main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented in the scriptures as a. type of some future event.. he quoted schroeder who said if an account isnt explained in the scriptures as a type than you.
shouldnt use the event as a type.. splane summed up his talk by saying if the bible is silent - we must be silent.. but they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly.
going beyond anything written in the bible about nebuchadnezzars tree dream.. the bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing nebuchadnezzar.. daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.. .
Phizzy,
Thanks for pointing out the wording in 4:33. I overlooked that. It is very explicit in regards to the meaning of the dream.
All the rest is obiously a Watchtower dream.
Splane said the GB is having trouble keeping up with the Celestial Chariot.
He should have said they are having trouble keeping up with JWD.
at the corporate meeting david splane discusses the use and misuse of types/antitypes.. the main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented in the scriptures as a. type of some future event.. he quoted schroeder who said if an account isnt explained in the scriptures as a type than you.
shouldnt use the event as a type.. splane summed up his talk by saying if the bible is silent - we must be silent.. but they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly.
going beyond anything written in the bible about nebuchadnezzars tree dream.. the bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing nebuchadnezzar.. daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.. .
At the Corporate meeting David Splane discusses the use and misuse of Types/Antitypes.
The main qualifier of a type is that an account must be represented IN THE SCRIPTURES as a
type of some future event.
He quoted Schroeder who said if an account isn’t explained in the scriptures as a “type” than you
shouldn’t use the event as a type.
Splane summed up his talk by saying “If the Bible is silent - we must be silent”.
But they go right on celebrating the 100 years from 1914 which was determined by improperly
going beyond anything written in the Bible about Nebuchadnezzar’s Tree Dream.
The Bible specifically refers to the immense tree as representing Nebuchadnezzar. Nothing more.
Daniel explained it and that should be the end of the matter.
i agree with the witnesses about almost nothing, but i do think they have the right idea when it concerns the 'soul'.
it is my belief that there is no such entity as a 'soul' that resides in a human being.
the idea originated in ancient, pre-scientific eras.
It's not a matter of agreeing with JW's. The Bible view of the soul as the living organism is good science and philosophy.
Aristotle also had a scientific view of the soul compared to Plato.
Resurrection/cloning if there ever were such a thing would not be for your benefit but for the benefit of the community you share.
We really don't have accurate memories of our own histories.
If any of us were cloned we would be up to speed in a jiffy developing enough induced fabricated memory to make people around us happy and after a couple hundred years your current history would dominate and you would hardly care.
Do you care about the 365 days you spent as a five year old?
obviously he didn't.. so now they can because the dictators say it's ok.. and jw's think their religion isn't a high control group?.
.
.
Obviously he didn't.
So now they can have sisters on the sacred stage - without head coverings - giving "praise dance" lessons because the dictators say it's OK.
And JW's think their religion ISN'T a high control group?
dude, every picture i see of any bethel heavies or gb members (a lot of cos also) have them wearing a second huge gold ring!
this is a clear sign of "hey i'm a bigshot!
" you just dont see that in interviews of celebrities or politicials.
Pinky rings are in the same class as tatoos. They are identity statements.
"I am rich"
"I am special"
"I am important"
"I am gay"
"I am top boss"
"I achieved"
"I belong"
I like pinky rings. When I see a man with one it is a warning to stay as far away as possible.
There are lots of google links to men wearing pinky rings. And it seems most of the views are on the negative eye-rolling side and at best given a "whatever".
But now that we know "Happiness is the Truth"(Pharrel Williams) - then party on you pitiful old men.
my son and i were discussing this yesterday over coffee.
since the wt society in previous years virtually demonized going on the internet at all for jw's - now wt leaders are doing a complete turn around or about face probably so as to " compete " or keep up with all the anti-jw websites that are out there to give the wt society point of view.. however- it very well may backfire on them as once people start doing google searches looking for jw.org it will bring up all the other websites dealing with any jw issues and in the privacy of their own homes out of curiosity i'm sure lots of jw's are going to want to check out some of these sites to see what all the " apostate " hoopla is all about.
i wonder how many jw's will do this and will it have an effect in opening more minds to other views ?
