The whole "we are not DF'ing those who receive blood transfusion" thing is really disgusting. When journalists are asking how the org handles members who take a transfusion, they are not interested in the cult's internal terminology: DF vs DA. They want to know if there are any threats to those who decide to take it. And if a JW representative says they are not DF'd he is deliberately lying.
On the other hand the brochure "branch correspondence guidelines" (from lwleaks.org) says:
A baptized person who willfully
and unrepentantly takes a blood trans-
fusion thereby chooses to reject the
Scriptural sanctity of blood and violates
God’s law. Three elders (not a judicial
committee) should meet with him. If
a blood transfusion has been accept-
ed without repentance, the congregation
will consider that the person has disas-
sociated himself. It would then be an-
nounced: “[Name of individual] is no
longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses.”
it is a pity journalists do not use this when confronting WTS representatives.