Despite some people saying it's a good thing if Al Gore hypes the man-made global warming theory, calling it "truth" is another one of his exaggerations. It isn't truth at all. Theory, yes.
Pistoff, thanks for the reference. The source I posted is one of many but it is prudent to follow where the research money is coming from. I admit that anyone receiving money from a corporation for research would be influenced to present views favorable in that corporation's interest. Of course, the same thing goes for politicans trying to rehabilitate their images.
Michael Crichton in one of his speeches both sides of the global warming argument should heed:
The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda. Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in the information age (or as I think of it, the disinformation age) it takes on a special urgency and importance.
We need an organization that will be ruthless about acquiring verifiable results, that will fund identical research projects to more than one group, and that will make everybody in this field get honest fast.
And if we allow science to become politicized, then we are lost. We will enter the Internet version of the dark ages, an era of shifting fears and wild prejudices, transmitted to people who don't know any better. That's not a good future for the human race. That's our past. So it's time to abandon the religion of environmentalism, and return to the science of environmentalism, and base our public policy decisions firmly on that.
http://www.crichton-official.com/speeches/
"Environmentalism as Religion"