Shanagirl (post 2)
People who are reading this discussion should know that "apocrypha" is a dangerous word and it is not a term that is usually thrown around so blithely by scholars.
The term Apocrypha is used with various meanings, including "hidden", "esoteric", "spurious", "of questionable authenticity" etc. The word is originally Greek (?π?κρυφα) and this literally means "those having been hidden away". The word took on the more negative meaning in the 16th century when the Protestants questioned the (until then) accepted canon of Scripture.
I think it is a misleading term since Protestants, for example, will use it to define certain books that are indeed canonical and accepted as authentic ... Therefore, since these books have not really been "hidden away" but merely neglected by the Protestants, I think it a very inaccurate and misleading term.
We have the recognized and accepted body of Canonical Scripture (some of which is rejected by modern Protestantism). Outside of that we have the edifying and instructional works like the Didache, Shepherd of Hermas, Protoevangelion of James, various epistles and early writings deemed meeting the standard as defined by the Canon of Scripture.
Beyond that the other works are outright forgeries and heretical works deemed outside the standards of Canonical Scripture as judged by the collective wisdom of the Church.
The Apocryphal writings, officially rejected by the church (though they may contain elements of the truth not found elsewhere) are those being tainted by gnosticism and other heresies. As with anything we go to the Church Fathers. The following are certain fakes and should not be read,
- Acts of Peter and Paul
- Acts of Pilate/Gospel of Pilate
The following are of the gnostics,
- Apocryphon of James
- Book of Thomas the Contender
- Dialogue of the Saviour
- Gospel of Judas
- Gospel of Mary
- Gospel of Philip
- Greek Gospel of the Egyptians
- The Sophia of Jesus Christ
- Gospel of Truth
- Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter
- Pistis Sophia
- Second Treatise of the Great Seth
- Apocryphon of John
- Coptic Gospel of the Egyptians
- Coptic Apocalypse of Paul
- Trimorphic Protennoia
Here is St. Athanasios 39th canonical epistle:
".... Continuing, I must without hesitation mention the scriptures of the New Testament; they are the following: the four Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, after them the Acts of the Apostles and the seven so-called catholic epistles of the apostles -- namely, one of James, two of Peter, then three of John and after these one of Jude. In addition there are fourteen epistles of the apostle Paul written in the following order: the first to the Romans, then two to the Corinthians and then after these the one to the Galatians, following it the one to the Ephesians, thereafter the one to the Philippians and the one to the Colossians and two to the Thessalonians and the epistle to the Hebrews and then immediately two to Timothy, one to Titus and lastly the one to Philemon. Yet further the Revelation of John."
Test all things keep what is good.