I would like to disbelieve Syme's points but I can't think of solid reasons why.
For some time now, we've had this collective debate about the GB and the changes we observe. Dogpatch kept asserting that some group like Directors must be in charge instead of the GB but could never produce any evidence.
I think the GB could take down any 'rebels' quite easily as they have in regard to stealing Kingdom Halls and getting title to them or even selling them off. It's true that they did a legal restructuring years back - partly out of fear that some half-senile GB members might end up on a witness stand in court .
I still recall Maximus' prediction about huge changes - just before 9/11 hit and they went reactionary instead. Even C of C suggests that some GB members thought various doctrines were bullsh*t but kept their mouths shut. That might always be under the surface.....
I've dealt with technical problems for many years and when an executive asks for an explanation, the reaction is always the same: their eyes glaze over and they get lost after the first sentence. That's just how it is.
Given that GB members are superficial dolts who lack critical thinking ability - as with many Witlesses- I think we must consider the above behavior as explaining a great deal.
metatron