ScenicViewer

Joined

• started 10 topics
• posted 1,581 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by ScenicViewer

• 
  58

  Just a quick Poll...Do you think the GB is sincere?

  by NikL in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've been thinking about this the past few days and curious what the honest consensus is here just for fun.. show of hands,.

  is the governing body.... a: completely sincere.

  they really do believe what they teach.. b: somewhat sincere.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  They're drones...

  If sincerity plays a role at all, they're sincere in their interest in perpetuating the Watchtower organization.

  
  
• 
  58

  Just a quick Poll...Do you think the GB is sincere?

  by NikL in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i've been thinking about this the past few days and curious what the honest consensus is here just for fun.. show of hands,.

  is the governing body.... a: completely sincere.

  they really do believe what they teach.. b: somewhat sincere.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  C: Completely insincere.

  At one time I thought they were sincere, but Geoffrey Jackson changed my mind when he testified before the Australian Royal Commission.

  He remarked that the Governing Body were simply "Guardians of the Doctrine." Have you ever heard the GB define itself that way? I searched the term 'guardians of doctrine' in the searchable Watchtower CD and got zero hits. I've never heard the term before, nor seen it in the literature.
  

  Yet he said it so easily, as if he has said it before. I have come to believe that it's an inside joke among GB members; they realize they are the entities that Jehovah's Witnesses really worship. The acronym is G.O.Ds.
  
• 
  24

  whatever happened to rotation? wt study to April two.

  by waton in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  with all the emphasis on hierarchical succession in that wt, , what ever happened to mentioning of the refreshing, liberating "rotating of positions" period, the time of great increase?

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  Blondie, that's a very good post from Jwfacts. The rotational arrangement was wrong, and who did the Organization blame because they got it wrong? In Watchtower's clever way, they blamed Jesus!

  Notice the subheading...

  THE KING ORGANIZES HIS SUBJECTS FOR GREATER ACTIVITY

  
  Watchtower 2014 Jan 15 p.15

  Of course neither Jesus nor Jehovah had anything to do with it - Watchtower does it's own meddling, makes it's own mistakes, then later has to make it's own refinements - but it sure sounds great to say 'the King did it.'

  
  
  
• 
  24

  whatever happened to rotation? wt study to April two.

  by waton in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  with all the emphasis on hierarchical succession in that wt, , what ever happened to mentioning of the refreshing, liberating "rotating of positions" period, the time of great increase?

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  28 At any rate, the experienced elders and overseers will be available for the Messianic King to appoint as “princes in all the earth,” from the very start of his thousand-year reign onward. [Man's Salvation (book), 1975, page 363, par28] (bold added)
  

  [There are other references saying that "princes in all the earth" applies to elders. (Ps 45:16)]

  So they went from being called servants to elders and overseers, to princes and glorious ones. And don't forget the reference that says they are "worthy of double honor." (1Tim 5:17)
  

  Wow, that's more presumptuous and worship seeking than what we usually see in the churches' clergy.
  
• 
  24

  whatever happened to rotation? wt study to April two.

  by waton in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  with all the emphasis on hierarchical succession in that wt, , what ever happened to mentioning of the refreshing, liberating "rotating of positions" period, the time of great increase?

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  I remember when elders rotated positions. I believe it started when the elder arrangement started in the early 1970s. Without looking it up, I seem to remember that it didn't last very long, only a few years, then it was abandoned probably before the 1970s ended.

  There never was a scriptural basis for it.
• 
  15

  tidbits from recent C.O. visit

  by nowwhat? in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  "all people in the world are currently considered enemies of god" gee i wonder where some poeple get the idea that we are an extremist organization.. " jehovahs chariot is moving forward at blazing speed!

  " in what reality is contraction and downsizing moving forward?.

  "it used to be that if a congregation reached 150 publishers we would split into 2 congregations now if we have 2 congs.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  "Don't believe negative media reports!"

  Unless, of course, they are about child abuse in the Catholic Church (or elsewhere), NO NO NO, NOT within Jehober's bOrganization!!

  Exactly! If media reports are negative to any other religion you not only can believe it, but Watchtower will quote the media report in the Watchtower and Awake magazines to show how bad that religion is.

  But when the same media makes the same report about Jehovah's Witnesses you can't believe it because, to quote Anthony Morris III, the media is controlled by "you know who!" As he is in the habit of doing he didn't finish his thought in that quote, but I suppose he meant Satan.

  Okie dokie then.
• 
  17

  Can we support Russian government's ban?

  by intropist in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  글쓴이: 류비 / 시간: 목, 03/30/2017 - 14:48. .

  hi, i want to leave my personal opinion on the matter of russian government's banning on the activity of jehovah's witnesses in their territory.

  i think it's more or less important because bearing a certain opinion is related with the quality of life.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  No matter how much we hated the JW organization, we could not support Nazi's persecution toward it.

  As for this time's Russian case, I think we can't support its ban.

  There is, of course, a big difference between the Nazi imprisonment and killing of Jehovah's Witnesses and the Russian ban on the religion for extremist reasons.

  I go back and forth with myself as to whether I support the ban or not, but there is one single JW practice that makes me lean toward supporting it - no blood transfusions, which results in loss of human life.

  If the ban goes through presumably Hospital Liaison Committees (HLCs) will not be allowed to exist and therefore cannot interfere in medical cases, which will result in the saving of life.

  The breaking up of families as a result of DF'ing and shunning is big with me too, but this may continue, business as usual, since JWs will continue to exist as an underground religion in Russia. However the practice may be curtailed a little bit.

  As to the human rights issue of banning any religion, it's true that Russia isn't exactly a world leader in supporting human rights, but neither are JWs who insist on freedom of religion for themselves but refuse to allow the same freedom to those who choose to leave the JW religion.

  If JWs receive the same treatment from the Russian government that they have dished out to their followers for many decades, then as far as I'm concerned it's just a matter of fighting fire with fire, and I will feel that they have met their match in the Russian government.

  In the end, if the ban goes through, I can support it mainly because it will interfere with Watchtower's no-blood policy, at least a little, and result in the saving of life over time.
  
  
• 
  44

  Red Alert - Propaganda is Being Used!!!!!!!!

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  check out the latest watchtower:.

  "your defense?

  be determined to stick to jehovah’s organization and loyally support the leadership he provides—no matter what imperfections may surface.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  Just take their word for it. Apostates bad... WTS good.

  Nice observation Undercover. From this thread it becomes clear that JWs are following an organization of men when they don't make sense, and rejecting other points of view when they do make sense.

  Thanks Darkspilver for the update on recent Watchtower guidelines to keep the followers in line even when they disagree with, and see flaws in, their leadership. I was thinking about those quotes recently and putting them all together like that is handy!
  
  
• 
  44

  Red Alert - Propaganda is Being Used!!!!!!!!

  by The Searcher in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  check out the latest watchtower:.

  "your defense?

  be determined to stick to jehovah’s organization and loyally support the leadership he provides—no matter what imperfections may surface.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  Despite being told to follow flawed and imperfect men Watchtower continues to pretend it's beliefs are based on the Bible.

  
  

  Watchtower (Study) July 2017, page 20, par 16
  

  16 Today, Jehovah guides us with his Word, the Bible.

  Then, notice how quickly Watchtower transitions from following the Bible into following imperfect men, as if following a flawed organization is the same thing as being guided by the Bible.

  
  

  Watchtower (Study) July 2017, page 20, par 16
  

  Think about how you benefit from reading the Bible, examining the publications of “the faithful and discreet slave,” watching JW Broadcasting, visiting jw.org, talking with the elders, and associating with fellow Christians. (Matt. 24:45) Have you not seen that Jehovah is swift to provide you with his guidance?

  This is a classic example of Watchtower blending concepts to make it appear that their literature, TV programs, imperfect and flawed leaders, etc, are on the same level as God's Word.

  Watchtower is effectively making itself equal to God. As most readers here can already see, the Organization and it's leaders are the golden calf that Jehovah's Witnesses really worship regardless of how flawed it all is.

  
  
• 
  29

  What's your degree of anti-JWness?

  by Landy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so, on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is absolutely pro-jw, 5 is neutral and 10 is youtubing nutjob apostate, where do you stand?.

  i'm probably around a 6. i have the view that jws are a nothing marginal religion.

  if i hadn't been brought up as one i doubt they would have ever entered my consciousness.. the reasons it's a 6 and not a 5 is that i have some concerns over their child baptism and safeguarding procedures, but i think it's down to them being a bit dim rather than any pro child abusing ethos.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  ScenicViewer

  Landy: I objected to your description...

  Yes, I got that.

  Landy: You used the term to elicit a particular response.

  No I didn't. I said the children were innocent simply because they are. I suppose your argument is that all small children are innocent, therefore it doesn't need to be mentioned. Fair enough, but I will ask the question again, Are you really finding fault because I said sexually molested children are innocent. Isn't that a bit nit-picky?
  

  Landy: Whether unconsciously or not. It was unnecessary.

  At the same time it doesn't hurt a thing, nor does it do anything to slant the judgement of people reading it.
  

  Does finding fault over trivial remarks make you feel superior? This is an attitude that I remember well from being a Jehovah's Witness. It's as if nit-picking wins points and makes the nit-picker somebody. It doesn't.

  In the OP you said you were about a 6 on your scale of being anti-Witness, but you come across more like a solid 1.

  What is really unnecessary is your fault finding over small details. I suppose it's all to draw attention away from the larger problem of JWs sexually molesting children and covering it up for the sake of public image.