Interesting. All this time I thought I was the right-wing, fuck-tha-poor, make-better-choices hardass. Looks like I'm an ol' softie compared to wasblind.
Sulla: I'm trying to understand your position. As you note above, these girls are under tremendous economic and societal pressures. Do you then want to deny them abortion and force an unwanted child upon them? Or are you simply pointing out that the problem is complex and solutions earlier than abortion are necessary?
Justitia Themis, I am indeed pointing out that the situation is complex. In a lot of these cases, there are "choices" made only in the broadest and least meaningful sense of the word. The girl in the Times article who had her first abortion at 15 and was back at 17 for another, and who couldn't predict whether she would use birth control in the future can hardly be said to be making an informed choice about anything important in her life.
That said, the problem of what to do with a useless and inconvenient person seems to bring us full circle to the original post.