Posts by MikeNightHaShev

57

Why is there evil

by d0rkyd00d in

don't know if this has been touched on before, but where did evil originate?

yes, some may answer satan.

but think about this: god created all things, and god is perfect.

Pomegranate,
It's a way of expressing the message and getting a point across
but now that you mention it 'G-d should be man's best friend' not the dog.
But if you don't understand what G-d is because the message about G-d is distorted by the fallen messengers of the Church then you would not understand the true meaning of becoming best friends with the essence we call G-d.
In other words you might take that literal instead of it's true sense.

57

Why is there evil

by d0rkyd00d in

don't know if this has been touched on before, but where did evil originate?

yes, some may answer satan.

but think about this: god created all things, and god is perfect.

MikeNightHaShev

>>>Why would his creation be imperfect if God is perfect?

Your questions stem from not understanding what G-d is through being taught properly the Biblical description of a non form or non image describtion of G-d. IN other words the Bible describes G-d as an essence and that essence being the power and source of life to become all it could or should be and this involves taking that chaos and imperfection and bringing it to order and perfection (to be all it could and should be). Thus G-d's essence is to LIVE while the adversary nature of man in decaying, desturction and death is called EVIL because it's opposite the nature to live.
Look carefully; "EVIL" is mirror opposite (backwards)the word "LIVE".

>>> And how did any sort of evil tendency reside inside of an angel

The story of the fallen angel requires context of the Hebrew word Malakh (which became angel). The word simply means Messenger/prophet therefore you have good messengers of G-d's words and bad messengers who rebelled from the word and taught their own.
Basically the story in the bible tells you the top main messenger prophet (archangel/false messiah) falls from grace for teaching adversary to the Torah and is replaced (overturned) by the Shiloh (one who's right it is)the true archangel who removes satan, therefore we know Moshiach is archangel Michael the remover of this adversary teachings.

32

Was Jesus a False Prophet?

by JosephAlward in

the bible says that a prophet who predicts something that does not occur is speaking words that the lord did not speak, but that is exactly what jesus did, if you can believe the author of mark.

here are the relevant verses:.

"when a prophet speaks in the name of the lord, if the word does not come about or come true, that is a word which the lord did not speak;" (deuteronomy 18:22).

MikeNightHaShev

>>>if they drink any deadly thing, it will not harm them

And we all know Jim Jones Proved this to be a false statement.
We all know those in his church were as intense of believers in Christ as one could ever be (selling their possesions and living in a selfless environment commune), so they should not have been harmed by what they drank according to the NT.
But just as Jesus lead his sheep to slaughter so to did Jim Jones on false promises.

Some Good Shepherd that Figure people call Jesus turned out to be, losing his flock allowing them to become dispersed and slain.

2

The Word

by MikeNightHaShev in

quote: .

>>but the word of god is not just black symbols on a page.

it is the ideas and thoughts.

MikeNightHaShev

Quote:

>>But the Word of God is not just black symbols on a page. It is the ideas and thoughts
>> of God Himself revealed to mankind. These revealed principles are preserved
>>in the Bible regardless of the minor differences in the manuscripts we have today.
>> That is the preservation of the Word of God He promised.
- -

The problem with this is that man still has to perceive what it means and do something with that word that's on that paper.

Now think about this carefully.
I hand you a pop up book and out of it pops up a picture of a shovel.
What will you perceive this shovel to mean?
One person sees it as a tool to dig Gold another to dig themselves out of their circumstances and another might see it as a shovel to shovel his BULL chips with because he feels guilt for always lying.
Each perceives the symbol differently depending on mood, attitude, ego, bias, affiliation, education, location, culture, fascination, drive, ability etc all influence what one perceives in the same message.

Now lets take this a step further.
What one does with this message of the shovel is also influenced by these factors as well as determining whether one progresses and is successful in life.
In other words someone who is of negative nature might never apply this shovel that pops out of the book to improve their life and might be insulted by it's message, but another more spiritually grown person might be able to use that message or symbol to advance themselves and influence their lives by implementing it to a positive means therefore they have done something with that book and applied it to better their lives.

Those who use the same book to improve their lives and society as a whole when they murder by their book or steal then go to jail by their influences through that same book they make that shovel merely dig dirt.
Others use that same book help humanity live good righteous lives they took that same shovel and made it dig gold.
Same Book, same shovel, but man still has to perceive and utilize it in his own will, there lies the problem.

That shovel in the wrong hands is dangerous and in the right hands it's a blessing.

2

My response to Pastor Parsley's Youth Minister

by MikeNightHaShev in

i keep getting obnoxious mail whether hate or conversion type mail from this world harvest church youth ministers and students so i wanted to share my response in order that you might remove the veil from your eyes.. --start response---.

you might be able to recognize the harlot church/mystery babylon but you have not yet woken (had the veil removed) to realize the image they created.

was one trying to unite all beliefs into one world religious order (as.

MikeNightHaShev

>> However there is one big thing your
>> overlooking about Christ vs Mithra. Christ was a real person.

There's where you are having the problem-Mithra and other myths and deities were sold as real as well.
By using real historical figures integrated into the legend they give the image breath so that it seems to speak
-Rev 13:15
In this you become none the wiser that it isn't a true historical account because you never bother to research historical records of that time period
to notice there is NO RECORDS of such a fantastic story and life. (I'll show this later in the email)***

If it was a story about one single persona then they would not have needed to create a new name, new birth date, new era for the character, as well as
other issues that pop up from trying to create an image from many.
Example: when borrowing from more then one character the image has two
professions:
Yeshu's Carpentry and Yehuda of Galilee's Fishing.
The character ends up having 2 blames for his persecution:
1)Yeshu's own tribe.
2)Yehuda's Tax revolt causing him to be persecuted by Rome.
Therefore there is a contradiction in some blaming the Jews others blame
Rome because there are two accounts-from 2 seperate figures.
The character ends up with the mythologies birth date.
He ends up with a new name Iesus (in syriac-Isho) which might be the reason
for the hint in Revelation about son of man coming in his own new name, his
own new name. The character seems to be in to many places at the same time
and stories don't add up regarding the escaping to Egypt and the time line
of the characters. Stories end up contradicting and admissions seem to pop
up like in Corinthians Paul says the apostles are teaching another Christ
and clergy admit James seemed to feel Paul was teaching another Christ which
is why they were at odds.

Fact: take away the prexisting legends and mythology of divine nature and
all you have are a few Martyrs who failed to Liberate their people, failed
to bring the Kingdom in their day and failed their prophecy- Jesus and his
disciples thought they were in the last days :
I Cor. 10:11 , Heb. 1:2 , I Peter 1:20, I Peter 4:7 , I John 2:18 etc.
Luke 21:24 & Romans 11:25 and history of that era show that
Revelation 11:1-3 occurred already in aprox 70 ad.
The Bible warns of all these about false prophets who do not speak for G-d.

Ezekiel CH 13, Deut 18:20-22, Isa. 30:10, Jer. 5:30-31, 14:14, 23:16, 26,
31-32.

In conclusion no matter which historical figure you call the Christ figure
they all did not fulfill the prerequisites of Moshiach and were created as a
figure by Rome to bring all cultures into their one religious order.
Which is what John of Patmos (not to be confused with the other Johns) was
warning about.

Read my book where I show where Rome has done this before.
In 3XX bc they did this same scam to the Veneiis with their godess Juno.
They slay the people, tell them Juno no longer protects them then they set
up the authority and Temple of Juno in Rome and claim they are the new
authority and worship of Juno. Rome did this with YHWH. By destroying the
Temple and Israel they declared the Jew was no longer G-d's people claiming
G-d did not protect them (of course from Rome itself -notice the similarity
to the racket business?).
Eventually they had slain all the many Messiah cults of that day that were
all torah observant and Rome claimed to these cultists that they now had the
Temple and authority in Rome for worship of G-d through this Christ called
Jesus (no-one was left to complain that it wasn't their particular Christ).
So they used this image to attract Dagon , Baal, Mithra, Hades, Osiris,
Apollo, Esus, and Krishna worshipers.
I don't believe this figure came to be what it is now until Constantine who
practiced all religions made the final adjustments to the character.

****Anyway here's the historical reference to that time period:

1] Jakob Burkhardt considers the wily Eusebius to be "the first thoroughly
dishonest historian of antiquity." He elaborates on his character as
follows:
"After many falsifications, suppressions, and fictions which have been
proved
in his work, he has no right to be put forward as a decisive authority, and
to these faults we must add a consciously perverse manner of expression,
deliberate bombast, and many equivocations, so that the reader stumbles upon
trapdoors and pitfalls in the most important passages." (Leben Konstantins,
2d edition, 1860, pp. 307, 335,
347.)....................

..............[2] Vossius, in the 16th century, possessed a manuscript of
Josephus which contained no mention of Jesus.

3] One of the historical writers who was alive during the supposed period of
Jesus was Philo Judaeus.
John E. Remsburg, in The Christ, writes:

"Philo was born before the beginning of the Christian era, and lived until
long after the reputed death of Christ. He wrote an account of the Jews
covering the entire time that Christ is said to have existed on earth. He
was living in or near Jerusalem when Christ's miraculous birth and the
Herodian massacre occurred. He was there when Christ made his triumphal
entry into Jerusalem. He was there when the crucifixion with its attendant
earthquake, supernatural darkness, and resurrection of the dead took
place when Christ himself rose from the dead, and in the presence of many
witnesses ascended into heaven. These marvelous events which must have
filled the world with amazement, had they really occurred, were unknown to
him. It was Philo who developed the doctrine of the Logos, or Word, and
although this Word incarnate dwelt in that very land and in the presence of
multitudes revealed himself and demonstrated his divine powers, Philo saw
it not."

4] There was a historian named Justus of Tiberius who was a native of
Galilee,
the homeland of Jesus. He wrote a history covering the time when Christ
supposedly lived. This history is now lost, but a ninth-century Christian
scholar named Photius had read it and wrote: "He [Justus] makes not the
least
mention of the appearance of Christ, of what things happened to him, or of
the wonderful works that he did." (Photius' Bibliotheca, code 33)

This would be like Matt Drudge Living next door to the ex-president as the
ex-president drives his car over another neighbors cat and runs the car
through into the living room jumps out naked does a Polka playing the
saxaphone and Drudge never writes about it happening.
In other words if these Historians never wrote about him, then the figure
did not exist as they are claiming or they didn't make the characters
popular till later in time through embellishing the stories.

17

Did the Son of Man Come?

by JosephAlward in

if the author of the book of matthew can be believed, jesus left no doubt about when the apocalypse would occur.

it would be before all of jesus' disciples died, even before his disciples would be able to spread the good word to all of the cities of israel.

since all of the disciples are dead and the apocalypse hasn't occurred, we must conclude that matthew was wrong and that the bible is in error.

MikeNightHaShev

They thought they were in the last days:
I Cor. 10:11 , Heb. 1:2 , I Peter 1:20, I Peter 4:7 , I John 2:18 etc.

Luke 21:24 & Romans 11:25 and history of that era show that
Revelation 11:1-3 occurred already in aprox 70 ad.
The disciples died and never saw the promised kingdom unless you admit his kingdom was DEATH (Sheol).

About 60 CE: Paul of Tarsus believed that Jesus would return and usher in a rapture during the lifetime of persons who were living in the middle of the 1st century.
About 90 CE: Saint Clement 1 predicted that the world end would occur at any moment.

The Bible warns of all these about false prophets who do not speak for G-d.

Ezekiel CH 13, Deut 18:20-22, Isa. 30:10, Jer. 5:30-31, 14:14, 23:16, 26, 31-32.

2

My response to Pastor Parsley's Youth Minister

by MikeNightHaShev in

i keep getting obnoxious mail whether hate or conversion type mail from this world harvest church youth ministers and students so i wanted to share my response in order that you might remove the veil from your eyes.. --start response---.

you might be able to recognize the harlot church/mystery babylon but you have not yet woken (had the veil removed) to realize the image they created.

was one trying to unite all beliefs into one world religious order (as.

MikeNightHaShev

I keep getting obnoxious mail whether Hate or conversion type mail from this world harvest church youth ministers and students so I wanted to share my response in order that you might remove the veil from your eyes.

--start response---

You might be able to recognize the Harlot Church/Mystery Babylon but you have not yet woken (had the veil removed) to realize the image they created
was one trying to unite all beliefs into one world religious order (as
preachers say will happen in our times)
whereby the RCC (Rome under it's mask) could be the authority. The
concept of the 2 Horn (duality power) system is that it's both Religious and
Political but under this system can hide and invade all kingdoms and collect
taxes through all kingdoms without insurection and tax revolts.
In Daniel chapter 7 in conjunction with Rev.chapter 13 ten horns rising out
of the sea it requires knowledge of words/slang used in those days.
Sea was one of the many underground terms used so that Rome would not know
they were talking about them.
Words Like Kittim and Sea refered to ROME while their army were called
ships.
Horns we know mean powers.
So Daniel sees the 10 powers coming out of Romes duality system:
The ten horns - the major barbaric tribes which undertook the division (not
fall) of the empire.
1. the Alemanni
2. the Anglo-Saxons
3. the Burgundians
4. the Franks
5. the Heruli
6. the Lombards
7. the Ostrogoths
8. the Suevi
9. the Vandals
10. the Visigoths
Perhaps the little horn = The Papacy...

Ezekiels use of the word prince or king of tyre in chapter 28 requires
knowledge of history and the place.
Tyre was ruled by Rome and was known for it's ROCKS (tyrus) and SEA while
also being where the purple dye was invented thus purple fabric mentioined
in REV with scarlet colors came from in trade. So being called King of Tyre
is being King of the Rock (Peter), King of the Sea (Rome), King of Purple
Garments aka the Vatican. Also being called Prince or King refers to the
popularity of one of the figures used for the Image of Christ
which became part of the story as Jesus popularity in Tyre was well noted in
the NT.
Everything in Ezekiel 28 about the fallen anointed cherub regards to the
Church and the character it gave breath to.
You see the image the church used in it's converged religion came from the
garden as per Ezekiel.
The Garden's location was Ancient Persia (ancient Iran not to be confused
with present day Iran) See Genesis 2:10-14 for the description.
And what figure on a cross who's virgin birth was on Dec 25th, who died and
then rose from a tomb 3 days later came from Ancient Iran?
That figure was Mithra predating the Christos figure. Mithraism was big in
Rome and especially in Tarsus where Paul was from.
Do you know about Mithra? If not you best use the Internet wisely and do a
thorough search on the figure, you might be surprised what you find.
In fact the Mithraic crooked cross with the sickly man on it that the Pope
carries is similar to the Predated cross they found near Ireland.

So you know the Church foundation but you have no clue to the
figure/image/icon that they created is but a convergance of all
mythology/martyrs/cults/ and religions of that age in order to bring one
united religion whereby the tithes (like taxes) went to Rome and loyalty and
devotion was towards Rome
as this IDOL god's authority.-warning in Isaiah 44:9, 12-17

The many borrowed stories of historical characters used in reference to the
gospel accounts were used to signify the fulfillment of these idol gods in
order to seduce the cultists. The Fisherman Christ from Capernaum=Yehuda
of Galilee who die on the cross (6 BC) by Rome for his tax revolt
-Matthew 17:22-24 & Mark12:14-17 was to seduce the Dagon (fish-man god)
worshipers. (notice the fish head Dagon Priest hat the Pope wears).
Dagons son was Baal and you see the Baal symbol of the sun cross all over
the icons of saints, Mary, Jesus and on robes and even the KKK and nato uses
the sysmbol of Baal (the cross inside the circle).
Baal is known as the god of 'harvest' so the stories of seeds, 'Apollos'
light (the word Pastor Parsely wanted you all to skip), watering the seeds,
planting harvest and talk about chaffs and wheat and the symbols of the
harvest on robes are all Baal priests teachings.
So you belong to the Harvest Church, do you really know what seed you are
spreading or how much manure it takes the Pastor to spread those seeds of
Baal?
Now the sorcery/miracle worker who was a carpenter not a fisherman - the
Christ figure who was son of Mary who died on Passover was called Yeshu ben
Pandera (100BC)
his stoning and hanging are recorded in acts as 'slew and Hung'- the holiday
references are in Mark and John.
Rome took more to this character figure because he was half Roman and he
appealed to the Mystery religions and cults of Mithra and Enki and Egyptian
cults of Osiris and Horus.
There were many other martyrs all converged for the one figure which was
made to seem like one historical person thus they needed a new name, new
birthdate and time period for the Icon to place him in and when they did all
kinds of trouble came from this new date, one being the stories never added
up to the time frames.
Example: needing to move his birth back to 6 BC because KING Herod (in the
Christ story) died in 4 BC. However not only did they mess up and need to
move the date but even that date does not coincide with the Census of 7 BC.
Furthermore the widows Mite in the NT accounts is a Jannaeus Alexander coin
(100BC) and so is the real character of Salome who was a friend and follower
of Yeshu.
More figures: The christ figure 'Theudas' who's disciples were Martyrs and
were of the region of the river Jordan and Baptised in the River Jordan.
another case of integrating all cult and martyr figures into one persona to
try and attract all bases into this new religion, which also included
Mithraic
mythology to attract the Mystery religion, along with other mythologies of
Hades, Esus, Krishna, Zeus, Baal, Dagon, Athtar the Fierce, Osiris, Horus,
etc etc. Note; Constantine studied and practices many of these religions.
By doing this they had some attachment or attraction in expectations of all
faiths and of course one of them was Judaism.
But Jews would not fall for the poor attempt because they know the
expectations of Moshiach is not of a divine person or G-d, from the new
fabricated and self testified pagan version of a redeemer who was also a god
in order to use that image to make people submit to that authority.

Now you are prepared to read my book, that's if you want to see how this all
comes together in unveiling that deception.
http://www.vidavision.com/faith/hashev/freebook.html

14

Where is the proof???

by tracysdad in

where is the scriptural proof that jesus christ is michael the archangel?

is there one verse that states as such?

can michael be worshipped as christ was?

MikeNightHaShev

By admiting Jesus was served and praised we can conclude you admit he can't be the son of man who he himself is saying in Matthew is another person (third person tense) who is a servant not served.

Matthew 20:28 Just as the son of man did not come to be served',
but to serve.

So to answer your question Michael as Ha-Moshiach is not to be worshiped or venerated anymore then Moses is worshiped or venerated for he too was a liberator, but not the essence we are to recognize and reflect.

14

Where is the proof???

by tracysdad in

where is the scriptural proof that jesus christ is michael the archangel?

is there one verse that states as such?

can michael be worshipped as christ was?

MikeNightHaShev

Or maybe it was this verse:
Jesus in Matthew 17:1-4 of the New Testament contends with Peter over building tabernacles for Moses and Elijah to be venerated in a similar forbidden manner.

It also pays to know Jude 1:9 comes from
The Apocryphal Book the Assumption of Moses.

14

Where is the proof???

by tracysdad in

where is the scriptural proof that jesus christ is michael the archangel?

is there one verse that states as such?

can michael be worshipped as christ was?

MikeNightHaShev

I think it was in Mark 9:5
Peter argued with Jesus, " Rabbi, it is good for us to be here;
<*6> let us make three [2] tabernacles, one for You, and one for Moses, and one for Elijah.''