Frankie - I don't think there is such a thing as “mild pedophilia,” Is there also mild rape?
bohm - Dawkins seems to state that every victim think in the same way he does.
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
Frankie - I don't think there is such a thing as “mild pedophilia,” Is there also mild rape?
bohm - Dawkins seems to state that every victim think in the same way he does.
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
bohm - he was talking much more broadly than just his own experiances " In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called “mild pedophilia,”
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
You say black and white thinkers want everything spelled out, yet you clearly look at psychlogical books or websites for definitions of black and white thinking. Label me all you like, but I judge using my own morals not by using the work of psychologists. That's no better than being told what's right and wrong by the WTS. Given your opinions on child abuse maybe you should consider going back? Maybe become an elder? I'm done with you anyway.
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
That's fine Frankie. Please, Please be sure to keep in mind that I'm totally against child abuse and see it as a black and white issue. Who is the we you speak of? And, again what are these subtle shades of gray as regards child abuse?
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
Frankie, I'm sorry but I'll only ever see child abuse as black and white. Once somone is convicted of such a crime they are, as far as I'm concerned the lowest of the low. Again, what these subtle shades of gray you speak of as regards child abuse?
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
It's a typical leftie thing to say really; arrogant and inappropriate considering what Westminster is going through. He should keep his mouth shut
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
Black and white thinking? That's fine with me. Child abuse is dispicable, it's wrong! And it's about as black and white as you get. What exactly should we work with? Lowering prison sentnces for child abusers? Showing them more sympathy? Try not to talk about it so much? Give me any label you see fit, but I will always see child abuse as "black and white" Right and wrong. What are these subtle shades of gray? Are you saying you agree with Dawking? That a teacher sitting a child on his knee and putting his hand down his shorts is one of these subtle shades of gray?
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
Lol AlphaMan.
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.
Frankiespeaking - I think any talking down of such a vile crime is a terrible thing to do. As for victims feeling worse about about societies over reaction than the actual abuse it self. I'd beg to differ. I'm not anti Dawkins, but common, he should have really kept his opinion on this subject to himself.
http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/.